Literature DB >> 17400688

Sleep and well-being of ICU housestaff.

Sairam Parthasarathy1, Kathleen Hettiger, Rohit Budhiraja, Breandan Sullivan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Our understanding of the effect of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-mandated work-hour limitation on physicians' quality of life, sleepiness, and sleep-work habits is evolving. In this study, we sought to determine the effect of work-hour reduction on quality of life in residents and fellows (ICU housestaff) when subject to the ACGME-compliant schedule of one institution. To determine the effect of work-hour reduction on subjective and objective measures of sleepiness in ICU housestaff at a center.
METHODS: A single-center study of 34 residents and 10 fellows who were studied before and after the ACGME-mandated work-hour limitation went into effect in July 2003.
RESULTS: In a single center, after the work-hour reduction, residents reported statistically significant but minor improvements in sleep time, subjective sleepiness, and some aspects of quality of life (p < 0.05). Both before and after work-hour limitations, subjective sleepiness and quality-of-life indexes deteriorated during the course of the ICU rotation. Following work-hour reductions, subjective sleepiness improved (p < 0.05), but objective sleepiness was unchanged (p = 0.6). Moreover, after the implementation of work-hour reductions, 59%, 43%, and 25% of the ICU team had mean sleep latency < 10, 7, and 5 min, respectively, with 14% of the team manifesting sleep-onset rapid eye movement periods (signifying severe sleepiness) before beginning their extended work-hour period.
CONCLUSIONS: In ICU housestaff, at a single center, small benefits to quality of life and subjective sleepiness were realized by an ACGME-compliant work-hour schedule. Significant levels of objective sleepiness, however, remained. Further measures may need to be undertaken to address the persistence of sleepiness in ICU housestaff. These findings may not be generalized outside of the scheduling system studied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17400688     DOI: 10.1378/chest.06-1398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  6 in total

Review 1.  Information technology conduit as a portal to circumvent the graveyard shift.

Authors:  Amar Gupta; Shawna Sando; Sairam Parthasarathy; Stuart F Quan
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 4.062

2.  The effect of reducing maximum shift lengths to 16 hours on internal medicine interns' educational opportunities.

Authors:  Cecelia N Theobald; Daniel G Stover; Neesha N Choma; Jacob Hathaway; Jennifer K Green; Neeraja B Peterson; Kelly C Sponsler; Eduard E Vasilevskis; Sunil Kripalani; John Sergent; Nancy J Brown; Joshua C Denny
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 3.  Patient safety, resident education and resident well-being following implementation of the 2003 ACGME duty hour rules.

Authors:  Kathlyn E Fletcher; Darcy A Reed; Vineet M Arora
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Survey of internal medicine physicians trained in three different eras: reflections on duty-hour reform.

Authors:  Carolyn M Larsen; Meltiady Issa; Ivana T Croghan; Tamara E Buechler; M Caroline Burton
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 0.954

5.  Restoration of resident sleep and wellness with block scheduling.

Authors:  James Bordley; Algene G Agustin; Mohamed A Ahmed; Raeesa Khalid; Anthony M Paluso; Bethany S Kobza; Aaron W Spaugy; Jonathan Emens; Sima S Desai; Akram Khan
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 6.251

Review 6.  Finding the elusive balance between reducing fatigue and enhancing education: perspectives from American residents.

Authors:  John Hanna; Daniel Gutteridge; Venu Kudithipudi
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 2.463

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.