Literature DB >> 17400283

Assessment of clopidogrel responsiveness: measurements of maximum platelet aggregation, final platelet aggregation and their correlation with vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein in resistant patients.

Paul A Gurbel1, Kevin P Bliden, Amena Etherington, Udaya S Tantry.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Controversy surrounds the optimal platelet aggregation measurement to assess clopidogrel non-responsiveness. The P2Y12 reactivity ratio (PRR) determined by vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation levels has been used to indicate the extent of P2Y(12) blockade.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare the prevalence of non-responsiveness measured by maximum (MA) and 6 min aggregation (FA) and correlate these measurements with PRR in patients with non-responsiveness.
METHODS: MA and FA were measured in stented patients (n=100) before and after clopidogrel treatment. The PRR was determined in 22 non-responsive patients. Responsiveness was defined as pre-treatment minus post-treatment aggregation; and non-responsiveness was defined as <10% change in platelet aggregation.
RESULTS: Responsiveness was greater as determined by FA, p=0.006 (5 microM ADP) and p=0.003 (20 microM ADP)). There was a strong correlation between MA and FA stimulated by 5 microM (r=0.84, p<0.0001) and 20 microM ADP (r=0.90, p<0.001). The prevalence of non-responsiveness rose with agonist concentration but did not differ significantly between methods: 5 microM ADP [22% (MA) vs. 17% (FA), p=0.186] and 20 microM ADP [33% (MA) vs. 29% (FA), p=0.270]. PRR correlated with both MA (r=0.66, p<0.001) and FA (r=0.74, p<0.001) in non-responsive patients indicating incomplete receptor blockade.
CONCLUSION: Clopidogrel responsiveness is higher when measured by FA as compared to MA. However, these measurements are equivalent in determining the prevalence of non-responsiveness: FA and MA are affected to the same degree in patients with non-responsiveness. These findings are relevant to ongoing studies assessing platelet inhibition by P2Y(12) inhibitors and support previous studies that employed MA to assess non-responsiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17400283     DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2007.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Res        ISSN: 0049-3848            Impact factor:   3.944


  3 in total

1.  Frequency of heparin/platelet factor 4-dependent platelet antibodies in patients undergoing angioplasty and stenting for cardiovascular disease and their role for on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity.

Authors:  Thomas Gremmel; Karin Frühwirth; Christoph W Kopp; Alexandra Kaider; Sabine Steiner; Tamam Bakchoul; Ulrich J H Sachs; Renate Koppensteiner; Simon Panzer
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 2.  Platelet activation, and antiplatelet targets and agents: current and novel strategies.

Authors:  Yao-Zu Xiang; Ye Xia; Xiu-Mei Gao; Hong-Cai Shang; Li-Yuan Kang; Bo-Li Zhang
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Genotyping-guided approach versus the conventional approach in selection of oral P2Y12 receptor blockers in Chinese patients suffering from acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Chor Cheung Tam; Janette Kwok; Anthony Wong; Arthur Yung; Catherine Shea; Shun Ling Kong; Wing Hong Tang; David Siu; Raymond Chan; Stephen Lee
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 1.671

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.