Literature DB >> 17400096

Shear properties of bilaminar polymethylmethacrylate cement mantles in revision hip joint arthroplasty.

Patrick C Weinrauch1, Cameron Bell, Lance Wilson, Ben Goss, Cameron Lutton, Ross W Crawford.   

Abstract

Although cement-within-cement revision arthroplasty minimizes the complications associated with removal of secure PMMA, failure at the interfacial region between new and old cement mantles remains a theoretical concern. This article assesses the variability in shear properties of bilaminar cement mantles related to duration of postcure and the use of antibiotic cements. Bilaminar cement mantles were 15% to 20% weaker than uniform mantles (P < .001) and demonstrated variability in shear strength related to duration of postcure of the freshly applied cement (P < .001). The use of Antibiotic Simplex did not significantly influence interfacial cement adhesion (P = .52). Interfacial adhesion by mechanisms other than mechanical interlock plays a significant role in the bond formed between new and old PMMA cements, with an important contribution by diffusion-based molecular interdigitation. In the presence of a secure cement-bone interface, we recommend cement-within-cement revision techniques in suitable patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17400096     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.04.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  5 in total

1.  Ultrasonic cement removal in cement-in-cement revision total hip arthroplasty: What is the effect on the final cement-in-cement bond?

Authors:  A Liddle; M Webb; N Clement; S Green; J Liddle; M German; J Holland
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 5.853

2.  Impact of a double-layer cementing technique on the homogeneity of cementation and the generation of loose bone cement fragments in tibial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christian B Scheele; Matthias F Pietschmann; Christian Schröder; Christian Suren; Thomas M Grupp; Peter E Müller
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  The cement-bone bond is weaker than cement-cement bond in cement-in-cement revision arthroplasty. A comparative biomechanical study.

Authors:  Marcin Ceynowa; Krzysztof Zerdzicki; Pawel Klosowski; Maciej Zrodowski; Rafal Pankowski; Marek Roclawski; Tomasz Mazurek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Recent advances in the local antibiotics delivery systems for management of osteomyelitis.

Authors:  Reem Khaled Wassif; Maha Elkayal; Rehab Nabil Shamma; Seham A Elkheshen
Journal:  Drug Deliv       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 6.819

5.  Cement-in-cement stem revision for Vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty. A 3-year follow-up of 23 cases.

Authors:  Toby W Briant-Evans; Darmaraja Veeramootoo; Eleftherios Tsiridis; Matthew J Hubble
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.717

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.