Literature DB >> 17400033

Band versus bypass: influence of an educational seminar and surgeon visit on patient preference.

Raymond J Taddeucci1, Atul K Madan, David S Tichansky.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding are 2 common weight loss procedures. This investigation examined the effect of a preoperative educational seminar (ES) and surgeon visit (SV) on patients' choice of bariatric procedure.
METHODS: In our practice, patients choose their procedure. New patients receive an overview of both procedures in an ES, including the risks and benefits, and then meet individually with a surgeon (SV) to answer any additional questions. Three identical surveys (before the ES, after the ES, and after the SV) were given to new patients who voluntarily participated in this study. The survey queried procedure choice and influencing factors.
RESULTS: A total of 47 patients participated. Of these 47 patients, 31 had researched the procedures before the ES and 13 were unsure of the differences between laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding before the ES, 4 were after the ES, and 1 was after the SV. Also, 11% of patients changed their procedure choice as a result of attending the ES and SV; 15%, 13%, and 13% of patients were willing to be randomized to either procedure before the ES, after the ES, and after the SV, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Only 11% of patients changed their procedure choice as a result of attending the ES and SV. Thus, patient decisions are usually made before meeting the surgeon, and the information provided at the ES and SV simply reinforced those decisions. Only 13% of patients were willing (4% very willing and 9% somewhat willing) to be randomized to either procedure (laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding). It is likely that patients had confidence in, and were comfortable with, 1 procedure over the other, and therefore were unwilling to undergo the other procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17400033     DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2006.10.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis        ISSN: 1550-7289            Impact factor:   4.734


  5 in total

Review 1.  Psychosocial evaluation for bariatric surgery: the Boston interview and opportunities for intervention.

Authors:  Stephanie Sogg; DeAnna L Mori
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Patient preferences and bariatric surgery procedure selection; the need for shared decision-making.

Authors:  Andrew L Weinstein; Bryan J Marascalchi; Matthew A Spiegel; John K Saunders; Angela Fagerlin; Manish Parikh
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Laparoscopic single-site surgery for placement of an adjustable gastric band: initial experience.

Authors:  J Teixeira; K McGill; S Binenbaum; G Forrester
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Postoperative laparoscopic bariatric surgery patients do not remember potential complications.

Authors:  Atul K Madan; David S Tichansky; Raymond J Taddeucci
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Patient preferences regarding bariatric/metabolic procedures: a survey of Korean obese candidates for surgery.

Authors:  Su Yeon Roh; Yeon Ho Park; Woon Ki Lee; Seong Min Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 1.859

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.