Literature DB >> 17399845

Are there ethnicity-based differences in the evaluation of individuals with abnormal liver biochemistries?

Naga Chalasani1, Chandan Saha, Evgenia Teal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Recent studies suggested NAFLD is less infrequent in African Americans (AA) than in Caucasians but it is unclear if this difference is biological or due to under-recognition/under-referral. This study examined if there is an ethnicity-based difference in obtaining liver biochemistries or evaluating abnormal liver biochemistries by primary care physicians.
METHODS: This study consisted of 45,016 AA and 49,660 Caucasians seen at our primary care clinics over a 3-year period. From these two groups, we identified patients with elevated aminotransferases (AA: 3676, Caucasians: 4644) and elevated bilirubin (AA: 1295, Caucasians: 1199) based on predefined criteria. Subsequently, we assessed the proportion of patients in each group who had liver-specific evaluation (viral serologies, abdominal imaging or GI clinic visit).
RESULTS: Among patients with elevated aminotransferases, compared to Caucasians, AA did not have lower testing for viral hepatitis (26% vs. 25%), imaging (16% vs. 13%) or GI clinic visits (17% vs. 17%). Similarly, we did not observe clinically significant difference in the evaluation of elevated bilirubin between AA and Caucasians (viral serologies: 22% vs. 22%; imaging: 25% vs. 27%; GI clinic: 15% vs. 21%).
CONCLUSIONS: Under-recognition and under-referral are not likely to explain the reported ethnic differences in the prevalence of NAFLD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17399845      PMCID: PMC1933385          DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2007.01.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hepatol        ISSN: 0168-8278            Impact factor:   25.083


  6 in total

1.  Racial and ethnic distribution of nonalcoholic fatty liver in persons with newly diagnosed chronic liver disease.

Authors:  Shiobhan R Weston; Wendy Leyden; Rose Murphy; Nathan M Bass; Beth P Bell; M Michele Manos; Norah A Terrault
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 17.425

2.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

3.  Prevalence of hepatic steatosis in an urban population in the United States: impact of ethnicity.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Browning; Lidia S Szczepaniak; Robert Dobbins; Pamela Nuremberg; Jay D Horton; Jonathan C Cohen; Scott M Grundy; Helen H Hobbs
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 17.425

4.  Common comorbidity scales were similar in their ability to predict health care costs and mortality.

Authors:  Anthony J Perkins; Kurt Kroenke; Jürgen Unützer; Wayne Katon; John W Williams; Carol Hope; Christopher M Callahan
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Is NASH underdiagnosed among African Americans?

Authors:  Stephen H Caldwell; Danielle M Harris; James T Patrie; Elizabeth E Hespenheide
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Ethnic differences in the prevalence of cryptogenic cirrhosis.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Browning; K Shiva Kumar; M Hossein Saboorian; Dwain L Thiele
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 10.864

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Smoking and severity of hepatic fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Claudia O Zein; Aynur Unalp; Ryan Colvin; Yao-Chang Liu; Arthur J McCullough
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 25.083

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.