OBJECTIVES: To design a submaximal arm ergometry test (six-minute arm test [6-MAT]), for persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) and to determine the test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of this test. DESIGN: Prospective, exploratory, methodologic study. To determine test-retest reliability, subjects completed the 6-MAT on 2 days, separated by 1 week. Validity was determined by comparing 6-MAT results with peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak). SETTING: Tertiary rehabilitation center. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty subjects with SCI (mean age, 36.3y; 83% male). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Subjects were evaluated on the 6-MAT and a VO2peak test. RESULTS: All subjects were able to complete the 6-MAT. Test-retest reliability of steady-state oxygen consumption (VO2) and heart rate during the 6-MAT were excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], .81; 95% confidence interval [CI], .58-.92; ICC=.90; 95% CI, .75-.96, respectively). The correlation between VO2peak and 6-MAT VO2 was excellent (r=.92) and the correlations between VO2peak and 6-MAT heart rate (r=.63) and VO2peak and 6-MAT power output (r=.73) were good. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the 6-MAT has acceptable values for test-retest reliability and validity. The 6-MAT should be further tested for responsiveness to enhance its use as a clinical tool.
OBJECTIVES: To design a submaximal arm ergometry test (six-minute arm test [6-MAT]), for persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) and to determine the test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of this test. DESIGN: Prospective, exploratory, methodologic study. To determine test-retest reliability, subjects completed the 6-MAT on 2 days, separated by 1 week. Validity was determined by comparing 6-MAT results with peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak). SETTING: Tertiary rehabilitation center. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty subjects with SCI (mean age, 36.3y; 83% male). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Subjects were evaluated on the 6-MAT and a VO2peak test. RESULTS: All subjects were able to complete the 6-MAT. Test-retest reliability of steady-state oxygen consumption (VO2) and heart rate during the 6-MAT were excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], .81; 95% confidence interval [CI], .58-.92; ICC=.90; 95% CI, .75-.96, respectively). The correlation between VO2peak and 6-MAT VO2 was excellent (r=.92) and the correlations between VO2peak and 6-MAT heart rate (r=.63) and VO2peak and 6-MAT power output (r=.73) were good. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the 6-MAT has acceptable values for test-retest reliability and validity. The 6-MAT should be further tested for responsiveness to enhance its use as a clinical tool.
Authors: Ralph J Marino; Tarcisio Barros; Fin Biering-Sorensen; Stephen P Burns; William H Donovan; Daniel E Graves; Michael Haak; Lesley M Hudson; Michael M Priebe Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2003 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: Erol Tulumen; Indira Khalilayeva; Kudret Aytemir; F E S C Ergun Baris Kaya; Onur Sinan Deveci; Hakan Aksoy; Ugur Kocabas; Sercan Okutucu; Lale Tokgozoglu; Giray Kabakci; Hilmi Ozkutlu; Ali Oto Journal: Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 1.468
Authors: Kerri A Morgan; Kelly L Taylor; Susan M Tucker; W Todd Cade; Joseph W Klaesner Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2018-03-08 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: Julia O Totosy de Zepetnek; Jason S Au; Adrienne T Hol; Janice J Eng; Maureen J MacDonald Journal: Appl Physiol Nutr Metab Date: 2016-03-15 Impact factor: 2.665
Authors: John McCulloch; Douglas Lorenz; Michael Kloby; Sevda C Aslan; Matthew Love; Daniela Terson DE Paleville Journal: Int J Exerc Sci Date: 2018-08-01