Literature DB >> 17398023

Analysis of biochemical control and prognostic factors in patients treated with either low-dose three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy or high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer.

Sujay A Vora1, William W Wong, Steven E Schild, Gary A Ezzell, Michele Y Halyard.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify prognostic factors and evaluate biochemical control rates for patients with localized prostate cancer treated with either high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) or conventional-dose three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy 3D-CRT.
METHODS: Four hundred sixteen patients with a minimum follow-up of 3 years (median, 5 years) were included. Two hundred seventy-one patients received 3D-CRT with a median dose of 68.4 Gy (range, 66-71 Gy). The next 145 patients received IMRT with a median dose of 75.6 Gy (range, 70.2-77.4 Gy). Biochemical control rates were calculated according to both American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) consensus definitions. Prognostic factors were identified using both univariate and multivariate analyses.
RESULTS: The 5-year biochemical control rate was 60.4% for 3D-CRT and 74.1% for IMRT (p < 0.0001, first ASTRO Consensus definition). Using the ASTRO Phoenix definition, the 5-year biochemical control rate was 74.4% and 84.6% with 3D-RT and IMRT, respectively (p = 0.0326). Univariate analyses determined that PSA level, T stage, Gleason score, perineural invasion, and radiation dose were predictive of biochemical control. On multivariate analysis, dose, Gleason score, and perineural invasion remained significant.
CONCLUSION: On the basis of both ASTRO definitions, dose, Gleason score, and perineural invasion were predictive of biochemical control. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy allowed delivery of higher doses of radiation with very low toxicity, resulting in improved biochemical control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17398023     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.01.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  40 in total

1.  Outcomes after intensity-modulated versus conformal radiotherapy in older men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Justin E Bekelman; Nandita Mitra; Jason Efstathiou; Kaijun Liao; Robert Sunderland; Deborah N Yeboa; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Preliminary patient-reported outcomes analysis of 3-dimensional radiation therapy versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy on the high-dose arm of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0126 prostate cancer trial.

Authors:  Deborah W Bruner; Daniel Hunt; Jeff M Michalski; Walter R Bosch; James M Galvin; Mahul Amin; Canhua Xiao; Jean-Paul Bahary; Malti Patel; Susan Chafe; George Rodrigues; Harold Lau; Marie Duclos; Madhava Baikadi; Snehal Deshmukh; Howard M Sandler
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Perineural Invasion and Risk of Lethal Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Piotr Zareba; Richard Flavin; Masis Isikbay; Jennifer R Rider; Travis A Gerke; Stephen Finn; Andreas Pettersson; Francesca Giunchi; Robert H Unger; Alex M Tinianow; Swen-Olof Andersson; Ove Andrén; Katja Fall; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Lorelei A Mucci
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Preliminary toxicity analysis of 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy versus intensity modulated radiation therapy on the high-dose arm of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0126 prostate cancer trial.

Authors:  Jeff M Michalski; Yan Yan; Deborah Watkins-Bruner; Walter R Bosch; Kathryn Winter; James M Galvin; Jean-Paul Bahary; Gerard C Morton; Matthew B Parliament; Howard M Sandler
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Comparing morbidity and cancer control after 3D-conformal (70/74 Gy) and intensity modulated radiotherapy (78/82 Gy) for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Martin Dolezel; Karel Odrazka; Milan Zouhar; Miloslava Vaculikova; Jana Sefrova; Jan Jansa; Petr Paluska; Tereza Kohlova; Jaroslav Vanasek; Josef Kovarik
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  Volumetric modulated arc therapy in prostate cancer patients with metallic hip prostheses in a UK centre.

Authors:  Wee Loon Ng; John Brunt; Simon Temple; Mohammed Saipillai; Anoop Haridass; Helen Wong; Zafar Malik; Chinnamani Eswar
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2015-04-14

7.  Certificate of need regulations and the diffusion of intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Bruce L Jacobs; Yun Zhang; Ted A Skolarus; John T Wei; James E Montie; Florian R Schroeck; Brent K Hollenbeck
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 8.  Late toxicity rates following definitive radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nitin Ohri; Adam P Dicker; Timothy N Showalter
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.344

Review 9.  Clinical controversies: proton therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kent W Mouw; Alexei Trofimov; Anthony L Zietman; Jason A Efstathiou
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.934

10.  Managed care and the diffusion of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Bruce L Jacobs; Yun Zhang; Ted A Skolarus; John T Wei; James E Montie; Florian R Schroeck; Brent K Hollenbeck
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.649

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.