Literature DB >> 17397974

Some aspects of the recombinantly expressed humanised superagonist anti-CD28 mAb, TGN1412 trial catastrophe lessons to safeguard mAbs and vaccine trials.

Jitendra N Mehrishi1, Miklós Szabó, Tibor Bakács.   

Abstract

We consider essential, still ignored, basic research aspects of the failed clinical trial (13 March 2006) of a recombinantly expressed humanised superagonist anti-CD28 mAb, TGN14122. Without hindsight, if for approval of the first ever recombinantly expressed anti-CD28 mAb use in humans attention had been paid to the physico-chemical factors and receptor saturation, the possible catastrophe will have been predictable and preventable. To understand what went wrong and, crucially, to prevent any future disasters to safeguard human health, safety and welfare, the information provided is likely to be of wide interest. We present calculations to show CD28 receptors on T cells of the six healthy volunteers by the anti-CD28 mAb superagonist, TGN1412. This led to the over activation of T cells and the violent cytokine storm precipitating the cascade and the release of endogenous molecules affecting other cells. Monocytes and plasma cells are likely to have been affected. We discuss briefly the role of neutrophils and activation releasing the surface-located sialidase affecting cell coats, such as, of T lymphocytes exposing galactose receptors that could have been involved in antigen presenting cell interactions. The role of the cell surface thiols of lymphocytes in forming mixed disulphides with endogenous ligands and in the REDOX system are briefly mentioned. Consideration of these various factors and a critical evaluation of the receptor occupancy data before injecting 0.1 mg/kg TGN1412 will have rung alarm bells about possible serious side effects and the catastrophe will have been averted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17397974     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.02.078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  5 in total

Review 1.  Preparing for first-in-man studies: the challenges for translational immunology post-TGN1412.

Authors:  C M Dayan; D C Wraith
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Breast and other cancer dormancy as a therapeutic endpoint: speculative recombinant T cell receptor ligand (RTL) adjuvant therapy worth considering?

Authors:  Tibor Bakács; Jitendra N Mehrishi
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 3.  The safety and side effects of monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  Trevor T Hansel; Harald Kropshofer; Thomas Singer; Jane A Mitchell; Andrew J T George
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 84.694

4.  Assessing agonistic potential of a candidate therapeutic anti-IL21R antibody.

Authors:  Yongjing Guo; Andrew A Hill; Renee C Ramsey; Frederick W Immermann; Christopher Corcoran; Deborah Young; Edward R Lavallie; Mark Ryan; Theresa Bechard; Richard Pfeifer; Garvin Warner; Marcia Bologna; Laird Bloom; Margot O'Toole
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 5.531

5.  NOG-hIL-4-Tg, a new humanized mouse model for producing tumor antigen-specific IgG antibody by peptide vaccination.

Authors:  Yoshie Kametani; Ikumi Katano; Asuka Miyamoto; Yusuke Kikuchi; Ryoji Ito; Yukari Muguruma; Banri Tsuda; Sonoko Habu; Yutaka Tokuda; Kiyoshi Ando; Mamoru Ito
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.