Literature DB >> 17397905

Histopathologic assessment of tumor regression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced-stage ovarian cancer.

Stefanie Sassen1, Barbara Schmalfeldt, Norbert Avril, Walther Kuhn, Raymonde Busch, Heinz Höfler, Falko Fend, Jörg Nährig.   

Abstract

To date, no histopathologic criteria have been established to describe treatment response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ovarian cancer. The aim of this study was to identify histopathologic features of tumor regression in ovarian cancer specimens obtained after neoadjuvant chemotherapy regarding their ability to indicate treatment response. This study systematically evaluated histopathologic features of tumor regression in advanced-stage ovarian cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n = 49) and in a control group treated with primary surgery (n = 35). In addition, the largest tumor size was measured in the surgical specimens. Overall survival served as the reference standard with a median follow-up of 49 months. There was a significantly higher presence of regressive changes in the postchemotherapy group compared with the untreated control group (P < or = .04). The presence of scattered solitary tumor cells, fibrosis, foamy macrophages, and giant cells of foreign-body type each indicated previous neoadjuvant chemotherapy with high specificity (80.0%-100%) but with low sensitivity (18.4%-63.3%). Inflammatory cell infiltrates, isolated psammoma bodies, and hemosiderin were also associated with previous chemotherapy but with lower specificity. The presence of necrosis was significantly correlated with larger tumor size within the specimens (rho = 0.5, P < .0001) and was more often found in the control group. For both groups, the extent of regressive changes, evaluated as a single parameter or in combination, showed no correlation with overall survival. However, patients with absence of residual tumor, scattered solitary tumor cells, or residual tumor foci of 5 mm or less after neoadjuvant chemotherapy had a significantly longer median overall survival of 45.6 versus 27.3 months in patients with larger tumors (P = .02). Various histopathologic features generally associated with posttreatment changes did not allow differentiation of responding from nonresponding patients and provided no prognostic information. The residual tumor size after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was the only criterion significantly correlated with treatment response and subsequent overall survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17397905     DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2006.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  16 in total

1.  Enhanced anti-tumor efficacy and safety with metronomic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for metastatic ovarian cancer using biodegradable nanotextile implants.

Authors:  Smrithi Padmakumar; Neha N Parayath; Shantikumar V Nair; Deepthy Menon; Mansoor M Amiji
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 9.776

2.  Diagnostic and Prognostic Significance of Ki-67 Immunohistochemical Expression in Surface Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma.

Authors:  Asha Mahadevappa; Shruthi Mysore Krishna; Manjunath Gubbanna Vimala
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-02-01

Review 3.  Data set for reporting of ovary, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal carcinoma: recommendations from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR).

Authors:  W Glenn McCluggage; Meagan J Judge; Blaise A Clarke; Ben Davidson; C Blake Gilks; Harry Hollema; Jonathan A Ledermann; Xavier Matias-Guiu; Yoshiki Mikami; Colin J R Stewart; Russell Vang; Lynn Hirschowitz
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 7.842

4.  Distribution of Resistant Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in the Resected Specimens of Clinical Stage III Patients after Chemoradiation: Its Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Nastaran Neishaboori; Roopma Wadhwa; Graciela M Nogueras-González; Elena Elimova; Hironori Shiozaki; Kazuki Sudo; Nikolaos Charalampakis; Adarsh Hiremath; Jeffrey H Lee; Manoop S Bhutani; Brian Weston; Mariela A Blum; Jane E Rogers; Jeana L Garris; David C Rice; Ritsuko Komaki; Stephen G Swisher; Heath D Skinner; Wayne L Hofstetter; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 2.935

Review 5.  Histopathological markers of treatment response and recurrence risk in ovarian cancers and borderline tumors.

Authors:  S Avril
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.011

6.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery in patients with serous endometrial cancer with transperitoneal spread (stage IV): a new preferred treatment?

Authors:  I Vandenput; B Van Calster; A Capoen; K Leunen; P Berteloot; P Neven; Ph Moerman; I Vergote; F Amant
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Accumulation of ALDH1-positive cells after neoadjuvant chemotherapy predicts treatment resistance and prognosticates poor outcome in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Tiyasha H Ayub; Mignon-Denise Keyver-Paik; Manuel Debald; Babak Rostamzadeh; Thore Thiesler; Lars Schröder; Winfried Barchet; Alina Abramian; Christina Kaiser; Glen Kristiansen; Walther Kuhn; Kirsten Kübler
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-06-30

8.  Clinicopathologic study in uterine cancer.

Authors:  I Vandenput
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2011

9.  Tissue biomarkers in prognostication of serous ovarian cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Binny Khandakar; Sandeep R Mathur; Lalit Kumar; Sunesh Kumar; Siddhartha Datta Gupta; Venkateswaran K Iyer; M Kalaivani
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  External validation of chemotherapy response score system for histopathological assessment of tumor regression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma.

Authors:  Jung Yun Lee; Young Shin Chung; Kiyong Na; Hye Min Kim; Cheol Keun Park; Eun Ji Nam; Sunghoon Kim; Sang Wun Kim; Young Tae Kim; Hyun Soo Kim
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 4.401

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.