Literature DB >> 17397772

Defining and measuring endoscopic complications: more questions than answers.

Klaus Mergener1.   

Abstract

The demand for information on quality in health care has risen sharply over the past decade. Endoscopic outcomes, including complication rates, need to be accurately measured and reported. Such documentation continues to be problematic because of the lack of a widely accepted classification system for endoscopic complications. Such a system should (1) include unequivocal definitions for the various types of negative outcomes and categories of complications; (2) define what negative outcomes are to be classified as complications, and (3) standardize the stratification of complications by severity. Establishing such a standardized classification of endoscopic complications could facilitate clinical research, improve the position of gastroenterologists vis-à-vis pay-for-performance programs, and result in better and more meaningful quality improvement programs, ultimately improving the care provided to patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17397772     DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2007.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am        ISSN: 1052-5157


  3 in total

1.  Canadian credentialing guidelines for esophagogastroduodenoscopy.

Authors:  Terry Ponich; Robert Enns; Joseph Romagnuolo; Jonathan Springer; David Armstrong; Alan N Barkun
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 2.  Complications of endoscopic and radiologic investigation of biliary tract disorders.

Authors:  Klaus Mergener
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2011-04

3.  Splenic Perforation Following Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Lakshmi Pasumarthy; James Srour
Journal:  Gastroenterology Res       Date:  2009-05-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.