Literature DB >> 17397582

[Resources and delays in the diagnosis of sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome].

Juan Fernando Masa Jiménez1, Ferran Barbé Illa, Francisco Capote Gil, Eusebio Chiner Vives, Josefa Díaz de Atauri, Joaquín Durán Cantolla, Salvador López Ortiz, José María Marín Trigo, José María Montserrat Canal, Manuela Rubio González, Joaquín Terán Santos, Carlos Zamarrón Sanz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The demand for consultations and diagnostic studies for sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (SAHS) has increased, and this has led to considerable delays. We therefore need an updated evaluation of the diagnostic situation to serve as a management tool for specialists and health care administrations responsible for solving the problem. The objective of the present study was to carry out a descriptive analysis of the situation regarding the diagnosis of SAHS in Spanish hospitals.
METHODS: We undertook a descriptive cross-sectional observational study. Public and private hospitals listed in the Ministry of Health's 2005 catalog of health care institutions were contacted, and those that routinely evaluate patients for SAHS were included in the study. The person in charge of each hospital filled in a questionnaire concerning the availability of resources and waiting periods for diagnosis.
RESULTS: Of the 741 hospitals we contacted, 217 routinely evaluated patients for SAHS. In 88% of these, respiratory polygraphy (RP) (n=168) or polysomnography (PSG) (n=97) was available. The mean waiting period was 61 days for consultation and 224 days for RP. The mean number of RP systems was 0.99 per 100,000 inhabitants, while the recommended number is 3 per 100,000 inhabitants. The mean waiting period for PSG was 166 days. The mean number of PSG beds was 0.49 per 100,000 inhabitants, while the recommended number is 1 per 100,000.
CONCLUSIONS: We observed a marked inadequacy of resources that has led to unacceptable waiting periods. While there has been a favorable change in the situation regarding SAHS diagnosis compared to previous studies, there is still room for improvement and it is urgent that healt hcare authorities allocate more resources to this public health problem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17397582     DOI: 10.1016/s1579-2129(07)60050-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Bronconeumol        ISSN: 0300-2896            Impact factor:   4.872


  4 in total

1.  Primary care and sleep unit agreement in management decisions for sleep apnea: a prospective study in Spain.

Authors:  Patricia Peñacoba; M Antònia Llauger; Ana M Fortuna; Xavier Flor; Gabriel Sampol; Anna Maria Pedro Pijoan; Núria Grau; Carme Santiveri; Joan Juvanteny; José Ignacio Aoiz; Joan Bayó; Patricia Lloberes; Mercè Mayos
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 4.062

2.  Significance of including a surrogate arousal for sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome diagnosis by respiratory polygraphy.

Authors:  Juan F Masa; Jaime Corral; Javier Gomez de Terreros; Joaquin Duran-Cantolla; Marta Cabello; Luis Hernández-Blasco; Carmen Monasterio; Alberto Alonso; Eusebi Chiner; Felipe Aizpuru; Jose Zamorano; Ricardo Cano; Jose M Montserrat; Estefania Garcia-Ledesma; Ricardo Pereira; Laura Cancelo; Angeles Martinez; Lirios Sacristan; Neus Salord; Miguel Carrera; José N Sancho-Chust; Cristina Embid
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 5.849

3.  GESAP trial rationale and methodology: management of patients with suspected obstructive sleep apnea in primary care units compared to sleep units.

Authors:  Núria Tarraubella; Jordi de Batlle; Núria Nadal; Anabel L Castro-Grattoni; Silvia Gómez; Manuel Sánchez-de-la-Torre; Ferran Barbé
Journal:  NPJ Prim Care Respir Med       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 2.871

4.  Apnea-hypopnea index in sleep studies and the risk of over-simplification.

Authors:  Eduardo Borsini; Facundo Nogueira; Carlos Nigro
Journal:  Sleep Sci       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.