N Fudge1, C D A Wolfe, C McKevitt. 1. Division of Health and Social Care Research, Guy's, King's and St Thomas' School of Medicine, King's College London (KCL), 7th Floor, Capital House, 42 Weston Street, London SE1 3QD, UK. nina.fudge@kcl.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It is a UK policy requirement to involve patients and the public in health research as active partners. OBJECTIVE: We reviewed published reports of studies which involved older people in commissioning, prioritizng, designing, conducting or disseminating research. Search strategy and selection criteria: systematic searches of databases (PubMed, SCI-EXPANDED, SSCI, A&HCI, ASSIA, Embase, CINAHL and Medline) for English language studies published between 1995 and 2005 which had involved older people as partners n the research process as opposed to research subjects. Articles were reviewed by two authors using a standardised matrix for data extraction. RESULTS: Thirty studies were included and classified according to the stage in the research process in which older people were involved. Barriers to involving older people were: cultural divisions, language barriers, research skills capacity, ill health, time and resources. Four of the studies had been formally evaluated to identify the impact of involvement. Evaluation focussed on the impact on participants rather than on impact on research processes and outcomes. Benefits to participants included: increased knowledge, awareness and confidence, meeting others in similar situations, empowering older people to become active in their community regarding decisions/policies which affect them. CONCLUSIONS: Factors hindering the involvement of older people in research were the same as reported factors hindering involvement of younger people, suggesting that age, per se, is not a barrier. To demonstrate the impact of user involvement on research quality, the definition of user involvement requires clarification, and systematic evaluation of research involving older people needs to be developed.
BACKGROUND: It is a UK policy requirement to involve patients and the public in health research as active partners. OBJECTIVE: We reviewed published reports of studies which involved older people in commissioning, prioritizng, designing, conducting or disseminating research. Search strategy and selection criteria: systematic searches of databases (PubMed, SCI-EXPANDED, SSCI, A&HCI, ASSIA, Embase, CINAHL and Medline) for English language studies published between 1995 and 2005 which had involved older people as partners n the research process as opposed to research subjects. Articles were reviewed by two authors using a standardised matrix for data extraction. RESULTS: Thirty studies were included and classified according to the stage in the research process in which older people were involved. Barriers to involving older people were: cultural divisions, language barriers, research skills capacity, ill health, time and resources. Four of the studies had been formally evaluated to identify the impact of involvement. Evaluation focussed on the impact on participants rather than on impact on research processes and outcomes. Benefits to participants included: increased knowledge, awareness and confidence, meeting others in similar situations, empowering older people to become active in their community regarding decisions/policies which affect them. CONCLUSIONS: Factors hindering the involvement of older people in research were the same as reported factors hindering involvement of younger people, suggesting that age, per se, is not a barrier. To demonstrate the impact of user involvement on research quality, the definition of user involvement requires clarification, and systematic evaluation of research involving older people needs to be developed.
Authors: Peter Crome; Frank Lally; Antonio Cherubini; Joaquim Oristrell; Andrew D Beswick; A Mark Clarfield; Cees Hertogh; Vita Lesauskaite; Gabriel I Prada; Katarzyna Szczerbińska; Eva Topinkova; Judith Sinclair-Cohen; David Edbrooke; Gary Mills Journal: Drugs Aging Date: 2011-08-01 Impact factor: 3.923
Authors: Lisa K Marriott; Adam C Lipus; Laurie Choate; Jamie Smith; Leigh Coppola; William E Cameron; Jackilen Shannon Journal: Pedagogy Health Promot Date: 2015-08-27
Authors: Philippa A Logan; Jane C Horne; Frances Allen; Sarah J Armstrong; Allan B Clark; Simon Conroy; Janet Darby; Chris Fox; John Rf Gladman; Maureen Godfrey; Adam L Gordon; Lisa Irvine; Paul Leighton; Karen McCartney; Gail Mountain; Kate Robertson; Katie Robinson; Tracey H Sach; Susan Stirling; Edward Cf Wilson; Erika J Sims Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2022-01 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Jeroen Geldof; Jean-Frédéric LeBlanc; Laura Lucaciu; Jonathan Segal; Charlie W Lees; Ailsa Hart Journal: Frontline Gastroenterol Date: 2020-11-11
Authors: Joakim Frögren; Steven M Schmidt; Maya Kylén; Oskar Jonsson; Björn Slaug; Susanne Iwarsson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-06-21 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Martine T E Puts; Johanne Monette; Veronique Girre; Christina Wolfson; Michele Monette; Gerald Batist; Howard Bergman Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2009-08-10 Impact factor: 4.430