Literature DB >> 17395507

Vagus nerve stimulation for refractory epilepsy: a Belgian multicenter study.

Veerle De Herdt1, Paul Boon, Berten Ceulemans, Henri Hauman, Lieven Lagae, Benjamin Legros, Bernard Sadzot, Patrick Van Bogaert, Kenou van Rijckevorsel, Helene Verhelst, Kristl Vonck.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a symptomatic add-on treatment for patients with medically refractory epilepsy. It consists of continuous electrical stimulation of the left vagus nerve by means of a helical electrode and an implantable, programmable pulse generator. Currently, over 50,000 patients are treated with VNS worldwide. AIM: This uncontrolled, open-label retrospective study evaluates long-term outcome in patients treated with VNS for refractory epilepsy in seven different epilepsy centres in Belgium.
METHODS: For the purpose of this study, a minimum of essential inclusion criteria were defined to collect relevant data. This limited the results to basic findings with regards to efficacy on the long term. Inclusion criteria were a follow-up of at least 12 months and a documented seizure diary before implantation and at maximum follow-up. Primary outcome measures were the reduction in mean monthly seizure frequency and the percentage of patients with a seizure reduction of at least 50% (responder rate).
RESULTS: About 138 patients (67M/71F) had a mean age of 30 years (range 4-59) at time of implantation and a mean post-implantation follow-up of 44 months (range 12-120). The mean number of AEDs before implantation was 3 (range 1-5). About 117/138 patients had focal epilepsy, 21 patients had symptomatic generalised epilepsy. About 117/138 patients were older than 16 years, 21 patients were 16 or younger. At maximum follow-up, mean stimulation output current was 1.84mA (range 0-3.25). Mean number of AEDs at maximum follow-up remained unchanged. The overall reduction in mean monthly seizure frequency was 51%. Mean seizure frequency before implantation was 41 seizures/month (SD=61; range 1-300), mean seizure frequency after implantation at maximum follow-up was 7 seizures/month (SD=25; range 0-120). Responder rate was 59%. 13% of patients had a seizure frequency decrease between 30% and 50%. About 28% had a seizure frequency decrease of<30%. Seizure freedom was obtained in 12/138 patients (9%).
CONCLUSIONS: The long-term experience with VNS in Belgium confirms that VNS is an efficacious adjunctive antiepileptic treatment for patients with refractory epilepsy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17395507     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2007.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Paediatr Neurol        ISSN: 1090-3798            Impact factor:   3.140


  24 in total

1.  Electrical stimulation in epilepsy: vagus nerve and brain stimulation.

Authors:  Barbara C Jobst
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.598

2.  Early seizure detection in rats based on vagus nerve activity.

Authors:  Kristian R Harreby; Cristian Sevcencu; Johannes J Struijk
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-10-02       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Vagal nerve stimulator implantation: the otolaryngologist's perspective.

Authors:  R Pratap; A Farboud; H Patel; P Montgomery
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Vagus nerve stimulation in drug-resistant epilepsy: the efficacy and adverse effects in a 5-year follow-up study in Iran.

Authors:  Hossein Pakdaman; Ali Amini Harandi; Mehdi Abbasi; Mohammad Karimi; Mohammad Ali Arami; Seyed Ali Mosavi; Karim Haddadian; Omidvar Rezaei; Sohrab Sadeghi; Guive Sharifi; Koroush Gharagozli; Parviz Bahrami; Farzad Ashrafi; Hosein Delavar Kasmae; Amirhossein Ghassemi; Mehran Arabahmadi; Behdad Behnam
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 5.  Vagus nerve stimulation in experimental heart failure.

Authors:  Hani N Sabbah; Itamar Ilsar; Asaph Zaretsky; Sharad Rastogi; Mengjun Wang; Ramesh C Gupta
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.214

6.  The P3 event-related potential is a biomarker for the efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation in patients with epilepsy.

Authors:  Leen De Taeye; Kristl Vonck; Marlies van Bochove; Paul Boon; Dirk Van Roost; Lies Mollet; Alfred Meurs; Veerle De Herdt; Evelien Carrette; Ine Dauwe; Stefanie Gadeyne; Pieter van Mierlo; Tom Verguts; Robrecht Raedt
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 7.620

7.  [Treatment of epilepsy: peripheral and central stimulation techniques].

Authors:  A Schulze-Bonhage; V Coenen
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 8.  Vagus nerve stimulation for epilepsy and depression.

Authors:  Andrew H Milby; Casey H Halpern; Gordon H Baltuch
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 7.620

9.  Efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation in brain tumor-associated intractable epilepsy and the importance of tumor stability.

Authors:  Kunal S Patel; Nelson Moussazadeh; Werner K Doyle; Douglas R Labar; Theodore H Schwartz
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 10.  Cardiovascular autonomic effects of vagus nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Iñigo Garamendi-Ruiz; Juan Carlos Gómez-Esteban
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 4.435

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.