Literature DB >> 17395180

Transient increases in choroidal thickness are consistently associated with brief daily visual stimuli that inhibit ocular growth in chicks.

Debora L Nickla1.   

Abstract

In chickens, transient changes in choroidal thickness are found in conditions in which the eye is slowing its growth in response to visual episodes that prevent excessive elongation. To test the hypothesis that the choroidal and ocular growth responses are linked, we used a variety of "brief daily" stimuli known to ameliorate the development of myopia and assessed the concurrence of the responses. If the hypothesis is true, they should always be correlated. Form deprivation w/vision or strobe. Diffusers were worn for 5 days and removed for 2h of "vision" each day in: (a) one block of 2-h (n=16); or (b) two 1-h periods (n=10). Strobe. Birds were given 0.5h episodes of 12 Hz strobe at dawn and dusk (12h apart, n=11). Negative lenses w/vision or strobe. Lenses (-10D) were worn for 5 days and removed for 2h of vision each day (n=14). Strobe. Same as above (n=11). Darkness/brief vision or myopic defocus. Birds in constant darkness were given 2 daily 0.5h episodes of light 12h apart (n=6) or one daily 0.5h episode of +10D myopic defocus (n=6) for 4 days. Darkness/"frequent" or "infrequent" myopic defocus. Birds in constant darkness were given frequent (2 min x 14) or infrequent (1 min x 7) episodes of +10D myopic defocus for 4 days. In all experiments a control group had the myopia-inducing treatment but did not receive the visual stimulation. High frequency ultrasonography was done at the start and end of the experiment, and on the last day immediately prior to and 1h after the period of stimulation. Refractive errors were measured using a Hartinger's refractometer at the end of the experiment. We found that in 7 of the 8 conditions the development of myopia was inhibited. Form deprivation: vision or strobe vs control: -1.2 and -1.8 vs -9.8D. Negative lenses: vision or strobe vs control: -1.2 and -4.3 vs -8D. Constant dark: vision or myopic defocus vs control: -0.7 and 1.8 vs -1.8D. Constant dark: frequent myopic defocus vs control: 4.8 vs -0.4D (p<0.05 for all comparisons). In all the effect was axial with growth rate being significantly inhibited. In all cases the choroids showed significant transient increases in thickness as well. Form deprivation: vision or strobe vs control: 58 and 15 vs -3 microm. Negative lenses: vision or strobe vs controls: 74 and 17 vs -17 microm. Dark: vision or myopic defocus vs control: 56 and 46 vs 11 microm. Dark: frequent vs control: 103 vs 5 microm. In the "infrequent myopic defocus" condition eyes did not compensate to the defocus, however they did not become myopic. The choroidal response was not significant. These results support the hypothesis that these brief choroidal responses may play a role in ocular growth inhibition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17395180     DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2007.01.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Eye Res        ISSN: 0014-4835            Impact factor:   3.467


  23 in total

1.  Cone signals for spectacle-lens compensation: differential responses to short and long wavelengths.

Authors:  Frances J Rucker; Josh Wallman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-07-27       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  The short-term influence of exercise on axial length and intraocular pressure.

Authors:  S A Read; M J Collins
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  The role of temporal contrast and blue light in emmetropization.

Authors:  Frances Rucker; Mark Henriksen; Tiffany Yanase; Christopher Taylor
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  The effects of simultaneous dual focus lenses on refractive development in infant monkeys.

Authors:  Baskar Arumugam; Li-Fang Hung; Chi-Ho To; Brien Holden; Earl L Smith
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Parasympathetic influences on emmetropization in chicks: evidence for different mechanisms in form deprivation vs negative lens-induced myopia.

Authors:  Debora L Nickla; Falk Schroedl
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2012-07-22       Impact factor: 3.467

Review 6.  IMI - Report on Experimental Models of Emmetropization and Myopia.

Authors:  David Troilo; Earl L Smith; Debora L Nickla; Regan Ashby; Andrei V Tkatchenko; Lisa A Ostrin; Timothy J Gawne; Machelle T Pardue; Jody A Summers; Chea-Su Kee; Falk Schroedl; Siegfried Wahl; Lyndon Jones
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Validation of Macular Choroidal Thickness Measurements from Automated SD-OCT Image Segmentation.

Authors:  Michael D Twa; Krystal L Schulle; Stephanie J Chiu; Sina Farsiu; David A Berntsen
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Patching fellow eyes during subjective night does not prevent disruption to minus lens compensation in constant light-reared chicks.

Authors:  Varuna Padmanabhan; Jennifer Shih; Christine F Wildsoet
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-08-03       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 9.  Temporal integration of visual signals in lens compensation (a review).

Authors:  Xiaoying Zhu
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.467

10.  Inhibiting the neuronal isoform of nitric oxide synthase has similar effects on the compensatory choroidal and axial responses to myopic defocus in chicks as does the non-specific inhibitor L-NAME.

Authors:  Debora L Nickla; Petya Damyanova; Grace Lytle
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2009-01-31       Impact factor: 3.467

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.