OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this work was to assess the prognosis in patients undergoing both coronary artery calcium (CAC) scanning and exercise myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS). BACKGROUND: Whereas the prognostic effectiveness of MPS is well established, recent studies indicate that quantification of CAC also predicts cardiac outcomes. However, prognostic information is not yet available upon which to guide the management of patients who have had both tests. METHODS: We assessed the frequency of cardiac death and myocardial infarction over a mean follow-up of 32 +/- 16 months in 1,153 patients undergoing both CAC scanning and MPS. Results were compared with those from a referent cohort of 9,308 patients who had earlier undergone MPS only. RESULTS: The frequency of myocardial ischemia rose with increasing CAC scores (p < 0.001), but ischemia was present in only 64 patients. Among the 1,089 nonischemic patients, of which only 3 (0.3%) underwent early revascularization, the annualized cardiac event rate was <1% in all CAC subgroups, including those with CAC scores >1,000. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed similarly low cardiac event rates among nonischemic patients with CAC scores >1,000 and nonischemic patients with Bayesian coronary artery disease likelihood > or =85%. Late myocardial revascularization rates were also similar in these 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with nonischemic MPS studies, high CAC scores do not confer an increased risk for cardiac events. Thus, although patients with high CAC scores may be considered for intensive medical therapy to prevent future coronary artery disease events, a normal MPS study in such patients suggests no need for more aggressive interventions.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this work was to assess the prognosis in patients undergoing both coronary artery calcium (CAC) scanning and exercise myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS). BACKGROUND: Whereas the prognostic effectiveness of MPS is well established, recent studies indicate that quantification of CAC also predicts cardiac outcomes. However, prognostic information is not yet available upon which to guide the management of patients who have had both tests. METHODS: We assessed the frequency of cardiac death and myocardial infarction over a mean follow-up of 32 +/- 16 months in 1,153 patients undergoing both CAC scanning and MPS. Results were compared with those from a referent cohort of 9,308 patients who had earlier undergone MPS only. RESULTS: The frequency of myocardial ischemia rose with increasing CAC scores (p < 0.001), but ischemia was present in only 64 patients. Among the 1,089 nonischemic patients, of which only 3 (0.3%) underwent early revascularization, the annualized cardiac event rate was <1% in all CAC subgroups, including those with CAC scores >1,000. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed similarly low cardiac event rates among nonischemic patients with CAC scores >1,000 and nonischemic patients with Bayesian coronary artery disease likelihood > or =85%. Late myocardial revascularization rates were also similar in these 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with nonischemic MPS studies, high CAC scores do not confer an increased risk for cardiac events. Thus, although patients with high CAC scores may be considered for intensive medical therapy to prevent future coronary artery disease events, a normal MPS study in such patients suggests no need for more aggressive interventions.
Authors: E Gordon Depuey; John J Mahmarian; Todd D Miller; Andrew J Einstein; Christopher L Hansen; Thomas A Holly; Edward J Miller; Donna M Polk; L Samuel Wann Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Thomas H Schindler; Xiao-Li Zhang; Gabriella Vincenti; Leila Mhiri; René Lerch; Heinrich R Schelbert Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Leslee J Shaw; Daniel S Berman; Roger S Blumenthal; Matthew J Budoff; Tracy L Faber; Tauqir Goraya; Sandra S Halliburton; Harvey Hecht; Hosen Kiat; Wolfgang Koenig; Shaista Malik; Michael Merhige; Khurram Nasir; James K Min; James O'Keefe; Donna M Polk; Paolo Raggi; Jeffrey A Rosenblatt; Ronald G Schwartz; Allen J Taylor; Gregory S Thomas; William Wijns Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2008 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Kevin A Bybee; John Lee; Richard Markiewicz; Ryan Longmore; A Iain McGhie; James H O'Keefe; Bai-Ling Hsu; Kevin Kennedy; Randall C Thompson; Timothy M Bateman Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2009-12-11 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Alan Rozanski; Heidi Gransar; Nathan D Wong; Leslee J Shaw; Romalisa Miranda-Peats; Sean W Hayes; John D Friedman; Daniel S Berman Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2007 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.952