AIM: Nitric oxide (NO) and superoxide are considered to be regulatory in renal blood flow (RBF) autoregulation, and hence may contribute to development of hypertension. To extend our previous observations that dynamic NO release is impaired in the spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) we investigated, firstly, if superoxide dependency of RBF autoregulation is increased in SHR and, secondly, if the beneficial effect of perinatal supplementation in SHR is partly as a result of early correction of RBF autoregulation. We hypothesized that perinatal supplementation by restoring dynamic NO release and/or decreasing superoxide dependency and would improve life-long blood pressure regulation. METHODS: Autoregulation was studied using stepwise reductions in renal perfusion pressure in anaesthetized male SHR, SHR perinatally supplemented with arginine and antioxidants (SHRsuppl) and Wistar-Kyoto (WKY), prior to and during i.v. Nomega-nitro-l-arginine (NO synthase inhibitor) or tempol (superoxide dismutase mimetic). RESULTS: Spontaneously hypertensive rat displayed a wider operating range of RBF autoregulation as compared with WKY (59 +/- 4 vs. 33 +/- 2 mmHg, respectively; P < 0.01). Perinatal supplementation in SHR decreased mean arterial pressure, renal vascular resistance and the operating range of RBF autoregulation (43 +/- 3 mmHg; P < 0.01). In addition autoregulation efficiency decreased. RBF autoregulation characteristics shifted towards those of normotensive WKY. However, dynamic NO release was still impaired and no clear differences in superoxide dependency in RBF autoregulation between groups was observed. CONCLUSION: Perinatal supplements shifted RBF autoregulation characteristics of SHR towards WKY, although capacity of the SHRsuppl kidney to modulate NO production to shear stress still seems impaired. The less strictly controlled RBF as observed in perinatally supplemented SHR could result in an improved long-term blood pressure control. This might partly underlie the beneficial effects of perinatal supplementation.
AIM: Nitric oxide (NO) and superoxide are considered to be regulatory in renal blood flow (RBF) autoregulation, and hence may contribute to development of hypertension. To extend our previous observations that dynamic NO release is impaired in the spontaneously hypertensiverat (SHR) we investigated, firstly, if superoxide dependency of RBF autoregulation is increased in SHR and, secondly, if the beneficial effect of perinatal supplementation in SHR is partly as a result of early correction of RBF autoregulation. We hypothesized that perinatal supplementation by restoring dynamic NO release and/or decreasing superoxide dependency and would improve life-long blood pressure regulation. METHODS: Autoregulation was studied using stepwise reductions in renal perfusion pressure in anaesthetized male SHR, SHR perinatally supplemented with arginine and antioxidants (SHRsuppl) and Wistar-Kyoto (WKY), prior to and during i.v. Nomega-nitro-l-arginine (NO synthase inhibitor) or tempol (superoxide dismutase mimetic). RESULTS: Spontaneously hypertensiverat displayed a wider operating range of RBF autoregulation as compared with WKY (59 +/- 4 vs. 33 +/- 2 mmHg, respectively; P < 0.01). Perinatal supplementation in SHR decreased mean arterial pressure, renal vascular resistance and the operating range of RBF autoregulation (43 +/- 3 mmHg; P < 0.01). In addition autoregulation efficiency decreased. RBF autoregulation characteristics shifted towards those of normotensive WKY. However, dynamic NO release was still impaired and no clear differences in superoxide dependency in RBF autoregulation between groups was observed. CONCLUSION: Perinatal supplements shifted RBF autoregulation characteristics of SHR towards WKY, although capacity of the SHRsuppl kidney to modulate NO production to shear stress still seems impaired. The less strictly controlled RBF as observed in perinatally supplemented SHR could result in an improved long-term blood pressure control. This might partly underlie the beneficial effects of perinatal supplementation.
Authors: Diego B de Queiroz; Fernanda E Ramos-Alves; Raphaella L Fernandes; Cíntia P Zuzu; Glória P Duarte; Fabiano E Xavier Journal: J Physiol Biochem Date: 2010-09-24 Impact factor: 4.158
Authors: Arianne van Koppen; Jaap A Joles; Bas W M van Balkom; Sai Kiang Lim; Dominique de Kleijn; Rachel H Giles; Marianne C Verhaar Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-06-19 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Arianne van Koppen; Diana A Papazova; Nynke R Oosterhuis; Hendrik Gremmels; Rachel H Giles; Joost O Fledderus; Jaap A Joles; Marianne C Verhaar Journal: Stem Cell Res Ther Date: 2015-04-15 Impact factor: 6.832
Authors: Agnieszka Walkowska; Luděk Červenka; John D Imig; John R Falck; Janusz Sadowski; Elżbieta Kompanowska-Jezierska Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2021-01-28 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Andy W C Man; Min Chen; Zhixiong Wu; Gisela Reifenberg; Andreas Daiber; Thomas Münzel; Ning Xia; Huige Li Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2020-04-29 Impact factor: 5.810