C R Ratzlaff1, J H Gillies, M W Koehoorn. 1. St. Paul's Hospital Orthopaedic Medicine Clinic, the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. cratzlaf@interchange.ubc.ca
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between leisure-time physical activity and work-related repetitive strain injury (RSI), adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics and work-related physical and stress factors. METHODS: The data source was the 2003 Canadian Community Health Survey, a national cross-sectional survey of 134,072 respondents. The analysis was limited to a sample of the survey population reporting full-time work during the past 12 months (n = 58,622). The outcome of interest was work-related RSI of the upper body. Multiple logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between the outcome and leisure-time physical activity level, adjusted for sociodemographic, health, and occupational characteristics. The potential effect of leisure-time physical activity with a high upper-body load was investigated in a secondary analysis. RESULTS: The prevalence of upper-body work-related RSI was 5.9% in the Canadian population in 2003. An active lifestyle during leisure time was associated with a lower prevalence of work-related upper-body RSI (odds ratio 0.84, 99% confidence interval 0.75-0.95), after adjustment for work physical demands and other covariates. Female sex, obesity, smoking, age, work-related stress, and work physical demands were associated with RSI. In the secondary analysis, we did not find that participating in leisure-time activities with a high upper-body load was a risk factor for RSI. CONCLUSION: Our study results indicate that being physically active during leisure time is associated with a decreased risk of upper-body occupational RSI, adding another potential health benefit to participation in leisure-time physical activity.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between leisure-time physical activity and work-related repetitive strain injury (RSI), adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics and work-related physical and stress factors. METHODS: The data source was the 2003 Canadian Community Health Survey, a national cross-sectional survey of 134,072 respondents. The analysis was limited to a sample of the survey population reporting full-time work during the past 12 months (n = 58,622). The outcome of interest was work-related RSI of the upper body. Multiple logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between the outcome and leisure-time physical activity level, adjusted for sociodemographic, health, and occupational characteristics. The potential effect of leisure-time physical activity with a high upper-body load was investigated in a secondary analysis. RESULTS: The prevalence of upper-body work-related RSI was 5.9% in the Canadian population in 2003. An active lifestyle during leisure time was associated with a lower prevalence of work-related upper-body RSI (odds ratio 0.84, 99% confidence interval 0.75-0.95), after adjustment for work physical demands and other covariates. Female sex, obesity, smoking, age, work-related stress, and work physical demands were associated with RSI. In the secondary analysis, we did not find that participating in leisure-time activities with a high upper-body load was a risk factor for RSI. CONCLUSION: Our study results indicate that being physically active during leisure time is associated with a decreased risk of upper-body occupational RSI, adding another potential health benefit to participation in leisure-time physical activity.
Authors: Vicky S Massicotte; Nagat Frara; Michele Y Harris; Mamta Amin; Christine K Wade; Steven N Popoff; Mary F Barbe Journal: Exp Gerontol Date: 2015-10-27 Impact factor: 4.032
Authors: Hong Xiao; Maria Stoecklin-Marois; Chin-Shang Li; Stephen A McCurdy; Marc Schenker Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2015-05-06 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Glorian Sorensen; Anne M Stoddard; Sonja Stoffel; Orfeu Buxton; Grace Sembajwe; Dean Hashimoto; Jack T Dennerlein; Karen Hopcia Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: N X Jain; A E Barr-Gillespie; B D Clark; D M Kietrys; C K Wade; J Litvin; S N Popoff; M F Barbe Journal: J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 2.041
Authors: Dong L Xin; Michelle Y Harris; Christine K Wade; Mamta Amin; Ann E Barr; Mary F Barbe Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2011-03-29 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Mary F Barbe; Nisha X Jain; Vicky S Massicotte; Steven N Popoff; Ann E Barr-Gillespie Journal: Ind Health Date: 2015-02-09 Impact factor: 2.179