Earlise C Ward1. 1. University of Wisconsin-Madison, School of Medicine and Public Health, Center for Women's Health Research, 600 Highland Ave., Madison, WI 53792, USA. ecward@wisc.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine effectiveness of depression treatment in racial and ethnic minority women. INCLUSION CRITERIA: 1) the study examined treatment of depression among racial and ethnic minority women age > 17, 2) data analysis was separated by race and ethnicity, and 3) the study was conducted in the United States. Interventions considered were: psychotropic medications, psychotherapy (including cognitive-behavioral, interpersonal therapy and any type of psychotherapy adapted for minority populations) and any type of psychotherapy combined with case management or a religious focus. Individual and group psychotherapy were eligible. Each study was critically reviewed to identify treatment effectiveness specific to racial and ethnic minority women. RESULTS: Ten published studies met the inclusion criteria (racial and ethnic minority participants n = 2,136). Seven of these were randomized clinical trials, one was a retrospective cohort study, one was a case series, and the remaining one had an indeterminate study design. Participants' age ranged from 18-74 years, with a higher proportion > 40 years. Most were low income. Differences in treatment responses between African-American, Latino and white women were found. Adapted models of care, including quality improvement and collaborative care, were found to be more effective than usual care and community referral in treating depression. Although medication and psychotherapy were both effective in treating depression, low-income women generally needed case management to address other social issues. CONCLUSION: Adapted models that allow patients to select the treatment of their choice (medication or psychotherapy or a combination) while providing outreach and other supportive services (case management, childcare and transportation) appear to result in optimal clinical benefits.
OBJECTIVE: To examine effectiveness of depression treatment in racial and ethnic minority women. INCLUSION CRITERIA: 1) the study examined treatment of depression among racial and ethnic minority women age > 17, 2) data analysis was separated by race and ethnicity, and 3) the study was conducted in the United States. Interventions considered were: psychotropic medications, psychotherapy (including cognitive-behavioral, interpersonal therapy and any type of psychotherapy adapted for minority populations) and any type of psychotherapy combined with case management or a religious focus. Individual and group psychotherapy were eligible. Each study was critically reviewed to identify treatment effectiveness specific to racial and ethnic minority women. RESULTS: Ten published studies met the inclusion criteria (racial and ethnic minority participants n = 2,136). Seven of these were randomized clinical trials, one was a retrospective cohort study, one was a case series, and the remaining one had an indeterminate study design. Participants' age ranged from 18-74 years, with a higher proportion > 40 years. Most were low income. Differences in treatment responses between African-American, Latino and white women were found. Adapted models of care, including quality improvement and collaborative care, were found to be more effective than usual care and community referral in treating depression. Although medication and psychotherapy were both effective in treating depression, low-income women generally needed case management to address other social issues. CONCLUSION: Adapted models that allow patients to select the treatment of their choice (medication or psychotherapy or a combination) while providing outreach and other supportive services (case management, childcare and transportation) appear to result in optimal clinical benefits.
Authors: Amy W Wagner; Alexander Bystritsky; Joan E Russo; Michelle G Craske; Cathy D Sherbourne; Murray B Stein; Peter P Roy-Byrne Journal: Depress Anxiety Date: 2005 Impact factor: 6.505
Authors: Patricia A Areán; Liat Ayalon; Enid Hunkeler; Elizabeth H B Lin; Lingqi Tang; Linda Harpole; Hugh Hendrie; John W Williams; Jürgen Unützer Journal: Med Care Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Ronald C Kessler; Patricia Berglund; Olga Demler; Robert Jin; Kathleen R Merikangas; Ellen E Walters Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2005-06
Authors: Dennis A Revicki; Juned Siddique; Lori Frank; Joyce Y Chung; Bonnie L Green; Janice Krupnick; Manishi Prasad; Jeanne Miranda Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2005-08
Authors: Jeanne Miranda; Naihua Duan; Cathy Sherbourne; Michael Schoenbaum; Isabel Lagomasino; Maga Jackson-Triche; Kenneth B Wells Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Rachel Kimerling; Lori A Bastian; Bevanne A Bean-Mayberry; Meggan M Bucossi; Diane V Carney; Karen M Goldstein; Ciaran S Phibbs; Alyssa Pomernacki; Anne G Sadler; Elizabeth M Yano; Susan M Frayne Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2014-11-17 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Margarita Alegría; Evette Ludman; E Nilay Kafali; Sheri Lapatin; Doriliz Vila; Patrick E Shrout; Kristen Keefe; Benjamin Cook; Andrea Ault; Xinliang Li; Amy M Bauer; Claudia Epelbaum; Carmela Alcantara; Tulia I G Pineda; Gloria G Tejera; Gloria Suau; Karla Leon; Anna S Lessios; Rafael R Ramirez; Glorisa Canino Journal: Med Care Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Angelica JoNel Starkey; Christopher R Keane; Martha Ann Terry; John H Marx; Edmund M Ricci Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 3.671