Literature DB >> 1739359

Identification of severe coronary artery disease using simple clinical parameters.

B L Hubbard1, R J Gibbons, A C Lapeyre, A R Zinsmeister, I P Clements.   

Abstract

The purpose of our study was to examine the ability of clinical and resting electrocardiographic variables to provide useful estimates of the probability of three-vessel or left-main coronary artery disease. The study group consisted of 680 patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease who underwent exercise equilibrium radionuclide angiography and coronary angiography within 6 months. Sixteen clinical and electrocardiographic variables were examined by logistic regression analysis. The independently predictive variables were then used to develop convenient graphic estimates of the probability of three-vessel or left-main disease and to classify patients into high-risk (greater than 35%), intermediate-risk (15-35%), or low-risk (less than 15%) groups. Five variables were independently predictive of left-main or three-vessel disease: age, typical angina, diabetes, gender, and both history and electrocardiographic evidence of a prior myocardial infarction. A single graph was constructed that displayed the probability of severe coronary artery disease as a function of a five-point cardiac risk scale, which incorporated these variables. Two hundred sixty-two patients (39% of the study group) were classified as high risk; 127 of these patients (48%) had three-vessel or left-main disease. An additional 96 patients were classified as low risk; nine of these patients (9%) had three-vessel or left-main disease. Five clinical variables that were obtained on an initial patient assessment can provide useful estimates of the likelihood of severe coronary disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1739359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  10 in total

Review 1.  Advances in nuclear imaging for preoperative risk assessment.

Authors:  Jonathan Eddinger; Mylan C Cohen
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Outcome of patients with high-risk Duke treadmill score and normal myocardial perfusion imaging on spect.

Authors:  João V Vítola; Mauro R B Wanderley; Rodrigo J Cerci; Carlos C Pereira Neto; Otávio Kormann; Olímpio França Neto; José Antônio da Silva; Cláudio L Pereira da Cunha; Isabella Shin-Ike; Arnaldo L Stier
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Predictive Model for High-Risk Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  James J Jang; Manjushri Bhapkar; Adrian Coles; Sreekanth Vemulapalli; Christopher B Fordyce; Kerry L Lee; James E Udelson; Udo Hoffmann; Jean-Claude Tardif; W Schuyler Jones; Daniel B Mark; Vincent L Sorrell; Andrey Espinoza; Pamela S Douglas; Manesh R Patel
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 7.792

4.  Cardiac catheter complications related to left main stem disease.

Authors:  J D Kovac; D P de Bono
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  The prognostic value of pharmacologic stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with permanent pacemakers.

Authors:  André C Lapeyre; Indu G Poornima; Todd D Miller; David O Hodge; Timothy F Christian; Raymond J Gibbons
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Prediction of severe coronary artery disease and long-term outcome in patients undergoing vasodilator SPECT.

Authors:  K T Ho; T D Miller; T F Christian; D O Hodge; R J Gibbons
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 7.  Assessing clinical impact of myocardial perfusion studies: ischemia or other prognostic indicators?

Authors:  Todd D Miller; John Wells Askew; Joerg Herrmann
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 8.  Chronic coronary artery disease: diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Andrew Cassar; David R Holmes; Charanjit S Rihal; Bernard J Gersh
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.616

9.  Comparison of exercise electrocardiography and stress perfusion CMR for the detection of coronary artery disease in women.

Authors:  Simon Greulich; Oliver Bruder; Michele Parker; Julia Schumm; Stefan Grün; Steffen Schneider; Igor Klem; Udo Sechtem; Heiko Mahrholdt
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Why do authors derive new cardiovascular clinical prediction rules in the presence of existing rules? A mixed methods study.

Authors:  Jong-Wook Ban; Emma Wallace; Richard Stevens; Rafael Perera
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.