Literature DB >> 17392245

Evidence-based practice in radiology: steps 3 and 4--appraise and apply systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Steve Halligan1, Douglas G Altman.   

Abstract

A systematic review is performed in attempt to answer a specific research question by means of objective, unbiased evaluation of all pertinent available evidence. Component primary studies are selected on the basis of quality, and, if possible, their results are combined mathematically by using a process known as meta-analysis. While systematic review and meta-analysis are well-established methods to assess trials of therapeutic effects, they are increasingly more common in studies of diagnostic tests. In this article, the authors describe the benefits of a systematic approach over the traditional narrative review, illustrate the process, and examine some problems that are specific to systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic tests. They also explain how systematic review can help guide methodologic development for future research.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17392245     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2431051823

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  7 in total

Review 1.  Multiple systematic reviews: methods for assessing discordances of results.

Authors:  Lorenzo Moja; M Pilar Fernandez del Rio; Rita Banzi; Cristina Cusi; Roberto D'Amico; Alessandro Liberati; Giovanni Lodi; Ersilia Lucenteforte; Silvia Minozzi; Valentina Pecoraro; Gianni Virgili; Elena Parmelli
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2012-09-02       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 2.  Balloon-Occluded Retrograde Transvenous Obliteration (BRTO) for Treatment of Gastric Varices: Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jonathan K Park; Sammy Saab; Stephen T Kee; Ronald W Busuttil; Hyun J Kim; Francsico Durazo; Sung-Ki Cho; Edward Wolfgang Lee
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  Meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance for detection of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Michèle Hamon; Georges Fau; Guillaume Née; Javed Ehtisham; Rémy Morello; Martial Hamon
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 5.364

4.  MRI Features for Predicting Microvascular Invasion of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Seung Baek Hong; Sang Hyun Choi; So Yeon Kim; Ju Hyun Shim; Seung Soo Lee; Jae Ho Byun; Seong Ho Park; Kyung Won Kim; Suk Kim; Nam Kyung Lee
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 11.740

5.  Terminology and reporting criteria for radiofrequency ablation of tumors in the scientific literature: systematic review of compliance with reporting standards.

Authors:  Tae Wook Kang; Hyunchul Rhim; Min Woo Lee; Young-sun Kim; Dongil Choi; Hyo Keun Lim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 3.500

6.  Is quality and completeness of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in high impact radiology journals associated with citation rates?

Authors:  Christian B van der Pol; Matthew D F McInnes; William Petrcich; Adam S Tunis; Ramez Hanna
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Evaluating Diagnostic Test Accuracy: A Practical Review for Clinical Researchers-Part I. General Guidance and Tips.

Authors:  Kyung Won Kim; Juneyoung Lee; Sang Hyun Choi; Jimi Huh; Seong Ho Park
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 3.500

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.