Literature DB >> 17391713

Survey evaluations to assess marine bioinvasions.

Marnie L Campbell1, Brendan Gould, Chad L Hewitt.   

Abstract

Countries need to know what species are present within their waters to effectively manage the issue of non-indigenous marine species. Five survey methods are currently employed to detect introduced marine species: the Hewitt and Martin protocols (66% of effort; 73 ports, 12 countries); Rapid Assessment Surveys (7% of effort; 8 regions, 4 countries); the Bishop Museum protocols (7% of effort; 8 ports, 3 countries); the Chilean aquaculture surveys (1% of effort; numerous regions; 1 country); and Passive Sampling protocols (18% of effort; 20 ports, 2 countries). These methods use either quantitative, qualitative, or a mixture of the two sampling techniques and tend to target locations that are potential inoculation sites (i.e., such as ports, marinas and aquaculture facilities). To date, introduced marine species surveys have been implemented in 19 countries and have detected more than 1185 non-indigenous, 735 cryptogenic and 15,315 native species.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17391713     DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2007.01.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull        ISSN: 0025-326X            Impact factor:   5.553


  8 in total

1.  What lies beneath? An evaluation of rapid assessment tools for management of hull fouling.

Authors:  Cathryn Clarke Murray; Thomas W Therriault; Evgeny Pakhomov
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Harbor networks as introduction gateways: contrasting distribution patterns of native and introduced ascidians.

Authors:  Susanna López-Legentil; Miquel L Legentil; Patrick M Erwin; Xavier Turon
Journal:  Biol Invasions       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.133

3.  Classification of non-indigenous species based on their impacts: considerations for application in marine management.

Authors:  Henn Ojaveer; Bella S Galil; Marnie L Campbell; James T Carlton; João Canning-Clode; Elizabeth J Cook; Alisha D Davidson; Chad L Hewitt; Anders Jelmert; Agnese Marchini; Cynthia H McKenzie; Dan Minchin; Anna Occhipinti-Ambrogi; Sergej Olenin; Gregory Ruiz
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 8.029

4.  A spatial modeling approach to predicting the secondary spread of invasive species due to ballast water discharge.

Authors:  Jennifer L Sieracki; Jonathan M Bossenbroek; W Lindsay Chadderton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Biosecurity messages are lost in translation to citizens: Implications for devolving management to citizens.

Authors:  Marnie L Campbell; Dominic E P Bryant; Chad L Hewitt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Historical baselines in marine bioinvasions: Implications for policy and management.

Authors:  Henn Ojaveer; Bella S Galil; James T Carlton; Heidi Alleway; Philippe Goulletquer; Maiju Lehtiniemi; Agnese Marchini; Whitman Miller; Anna Occhipinti-Ambrogi; Melita Peharda; Gregory M Ruiz; Susan L Williams; Anastasija Zaiko
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Biopollution by Invasive Marine Non-Indigenous Species: A Review of Potential Adverse Ecological Effects in a Changing Climate.

Authors:  Anna Occhipinti-Ambrogi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-17       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Combining morpho-taxonomy and metabarcoding enhances the detection of non-indigenous marine pests in biofouling communities.

Authors:  Ulla von Ammon; Susanna A Wood; Olivier Laroche; Anastasija Zaiko; Leigh Tait; Shane Lavery; Graeme J Inglis; Xavier Pochon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.