OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that Doppler-derived (calculated) uterine artery volume blood flow (cQ(UtA)) reflects accurately volume blood flow measured directly (mQ(UtA)) in an experimental setting. METHODS: Five pregnant sheep were instrumented at 122-130 days of gestation under general anesthesia. After a 4-day recovery period, maternal hemodynamics were varied by administering to the sheep under general anesthesia noradrenaline, beta-blocker, low oxygen gas mixture, epidural bupivacaine and ephedrine, consecutively. The central venous pressure was obtained with the help of a thermodilution catheter. The mean arterial pressure and acid-base status were monitored using a 16-gauge polyurethane catheter inserted into the descending aorta via a femoral artery. A 6-mm transit-time ultrasonic perivascular flow probe was used to measure the mQ(UtA). Doppler ultrasonography of the uterine artery was performed and volume blood flow was obtained simultaneously by the transit-time ultrasonic perivascular flow probe during each phase of the experiment. RESULTS: A total of 31 observations were made. The mQ(UtA) varied between 90 and 800 (mean +/- SD, 419 +/- 206) mL/min during the experiments. The corresponding values for the cQ(UtA) were 110 and 900 (mean +/- SD, 459 +/- 211) mL/min. There was a significant correlation (R = 0.76; P < 0.0001) between mQ(UtA) and cQ(UtA). The mQ(UtA) correlated positively with Doppler-derived uterine artery absolute velocities, i.e. peak systolic (R = 0.50; P = 0.004), end-diastolic (R = 0.53; P = 0.002) and time-averaged maximum (R = 0.69; P < 0.0001) and time-averaged intensity weighted mean (R = 0.75; P < 0.0001) velocities. CONCLUSION: cQ(UtA) correlates well with volume blood flow measured directly. Doppler-derived uterine artery absolute blood flow velocities reflect uteroplacental volume blood flow in pregnant sheep. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright (c) 2007 ISUOG.
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that Doppler-derived (calculated) uterine artery volume blood flow (cQ(UtA)) reflects accurately volume blood flow measured directly (mQ(UtA)) in an experimental setting. METHODS: Five pregnant sheep were instrumented at 122-130 days of gestation under general anesthesia. After a 4-day recovery period, maternal hemodynamics were varied by administering to the sheep under general anesthesia noradrenaline, beta-blocker, low oxygen gas mixture, epidural bupivacaine and ephedrine, consecutively. The central venous pressure was obtained with the help of a thermodilution catheter. The mean arterial pressure and acid-base status were monitored using a 16-gauge polyurethane catheter inserted into the descending aorta via a femoral artery. A 6-mm transit-time ultrasonic perivascular flow probe was used to measure the mQ(UtA). Doppler ultrasonography of the uterine artery was performed and volume blood flow was obtained simultaneously by the transit-time ultrasonic perivascular flow probe during each phase of the experiment. RESULTS: A total of 31 observations were made. The mQ(UtA) varied between 90 and 800 (mean +/- SD, 419 +/- 206) mL/min during the experiments. The corresponding values for the cQ(UtA) were 110 and 900 (mean +/- SD, 459 +/- 211) mL/min. There was a significant correlation (R = 0.76; P < 0.0001) between mQ(UtA) and cQ(UtA). The mQ(UtA) correlated positively with Doppler-derived uterine artery absolute velocities, i.e. peak systolic (R = 0.50; P = 0.004), end-diastolic (R = 0.53; P = 0.002) and time-averaged maximum (R = 0.69; P < 0.0001) and time-averaged intensity weighted mean (R = 0.75; P < 0.0001) velocities. CONCLUSION: cQ(UtA) correlates well with volume blood flow measured directly. Doppler-derived uterine artery absolute blood flow velocities reflect uteroplacental volume blood flow in pregnant sheep. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright (c) 2007 ISUOG.
Authors: Jamie O Lo; Matthias C Schabel; Victoria H J Roberts; Terry K Morgan; Juha P Rasanen; Christopher D Kroenke; Sophie R Shoemaker; Eliot R Spindel; Antonio E Frias Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Jamie O Lo; Matthias C Schabel; Victoria H J Roberts; Xiaojie Wang; Katherine S Lewandowski; Kathleen A Grant; Antonio E Frias; Christopher D Kroenke Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2017-01-30 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Antonio E Frias; Matthias C Schabel; Victoria H J Roberts; Alina Tudorica; Peta L Grigsby; Karen Y Oh; Christopher D Kroenke Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2014-04-18 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Victoria H J Roberts; Lynley D Pound; Stephanie R Thorn; Melanie B Gillingham; Kent L Thornburg; Jacob E Friedman; Antonio E Frias; Kevin L Grove Journal: FASEB J Date: 2014-02-21 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Victoria H J Roberts; Jamie O Lo; Katherine S Lewandowski; Peter Blundell; Kevin L Grove; Christopher D Kroenke; Elinor L Sullivan; Charles T Roberts; Antonio E Frias Journal: Reprod Sci Date: 2017-04-26 Impact factor: 3.060
Authors: Ane M Holme; Maia B Holm; Marie C P Roland; Hildegunn Horne; Trond M Michelsen; Guttorm Haugen; Tore Henriksen Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2017-08-02 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: Antonio E Frias; Terry K Morgan; Anne E Evans; Juha Rasanen; Karen Y Oh; Kent L Thornburg; Kevin L Grove Journal: Endocrinology Date: 2011-03-29 Impact factor: 4.736
Authors: Kelly Kuo; Victoria H J Roberts; Jessica Gaffney; Diana L Takahashi; Terry Morgan; Jamie O Lo; Richard L Stouffer; Antonio E Frias Journal: Endocrinology Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 4.736
Authors: V H J Roberts; J P Räsänen; M J Novy; A Frias; S Louey; T K Morgan; K L Thornburg; E R Spindel; P L Grigsby Journal: Placenta Date: 2011-10-26 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Alec W Welsh; J Brian Fowlkes; Stephen Z Pinter; Kimberly A Ives; Gabe E Owens; Jonathan M Rubin; Oliver D Kripfgans; Pádraig Looney; Sally L Collins; Gordon N Stevenson Journal: Radiology Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 11.105