Literature DB >> 17390305

Medical device development: managing conflicts of interest encountered by physicians.

Donald S Baim1, Aine Donovan, John J Smith, Nancy Briefs, Richard Geoffrion, David Feigal, Aaron V Kaplan.   

Abstract

New technologies introduced over the past three decades have transformed medical diagnosis and treatment, and significantly improved patient outcomes. These changes have been mediated by the introduction of new medical devices, particularly for the treatment of cardiovascular, orthopedic, and ophthalmic disorders. These devices, in turn, have created large markets and spawned a burgeoning medical device industry, including six Fortune 500 companies whose combined market capitalization now exceeds 400 billion dollars. This success story, which has unquestionably benefited patients and society alike, has been dependent upon an intense collaboration among industry, clinicians, and regulatory authorities. However, when physicians actively involved in patient care participate in such collaborations, they are increasingly vulnerable to creating potential conflicts between these two (clinical and device development) roles. Such conflicts, which may ultimately erode public trust, have important consequences not only for the individual physicians, but also for their parent institutions, their patients, sponsoring companies, and the entire clinical research enterprise that makes the development and introduction of new devices possible. The third Dartmouth Device Development Symposium held in October 2005 brought together thought leaders within the medical device community, including academicians, clinical investigators, regulators from the Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), large and small device manufacturers and the financial (venture capital and investment banks) community. The Symposium examined the conflicts of interest encountered during the early development and commercialization of a medical device. The goal of these discussions was to (1) identify and characterize the conflicts that arise and (2) provide strategies to address these conflicts. This manuscript was prepared by a writing committee to provide a summary report of those discussions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17390305     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.21150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  5 in total

1.  Challenges in evaluating and standardizing medical devices in health care facilities.

Authors:  C Lee Ventola
Journal:  P T       Date:  2008-06

Review 2.  In vivo imaging and computational analysis of the aortic root. Application in clinical research and design of transcatheter aortic valve systems.

Authors:  Paul Schoenhagen; Alexander Hill; Tim Kelley; Zoran Popovic; Sandra S Halliburton
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Conflict of Interest: Are Iranian Breast Cancer Specialists Prone to it?

Authors:  Amirpasha Ebrahimi; Sanaz Zand; Fahimeh Bagheri Amiri; Farhad Shahi; Ali Jafarian; Ahmad Kaviani
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2020-06-01

4.  How Do Pharmaceutical Companies Overcome a Corporate Productivity Crisis? Business Diversification into Medical Devices for Growth Potential.

Authors:  Yoonje Euh; Daeho Lee
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  The institutional workers of biomedical science: Legitimizing academic entrepreneurship and obscuring conflicts of interest.

Authors:  Renata E Axler; Fiona A Miller; Pascale Lehoux; Trudo Lemmens
Journal:  Sci Public Policy       Date:  2017-11-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.