Literature DB >> 17389636

Variations in prenatal care quality for the rural poor in Mexico.

Sarah L Barber1, Stefano M Bertozzi, Paul J Gertler.   

Abstract

Quality is high on the Mexican health policy agenda. In this paper we evaluate the quality of prenatal care for rural low-income women. Women who obtained care from private practitioners and non-MDs received fewer procedures on average. Poverty predicts poor quality; however, indigenous women in private settings received fewer procedures, after household wealth was controlled for. We recommend strengthening clinical skills and providing incentives to adhere to quality standards. Quality reporting could promote informed employer care-purchasing and individual care-seeking choices. The national health reforms should be monitored to determine their success in not only increasing access among the poor and indigenous but also ensuring that such care meets quality norms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17389636     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.3.w310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  26 in total

1.  Cultural perceptions and negotiations surrounding sexual and reproductive health among migrant and non-migrant indigenous Mexican women from Yucatán, Mexico.

Authors:  Rebeca Espinoza; Isela Martínez; Matthew Levin; Alicia Rodriguez; Teresa Chan; Shira Goldenberg; María Luisa Zúñiga
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2014-06

2.  The Oportunidades conditional cash transfer program: effects on pregnancy and contraceptive use among young rural women in Mexico.

Authors:  Blair G Darney; Marcia R Weaver; Sandra G Sosa-Rubi; Dilys Walker; Edson Servan-Mori; Sarah Prager; Emmanuela Gakidou
Journal:  Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2013-12

3.  Gender-Informed Family Planning Perceptions and Decision-Making in Rural Chiapas, Mexico: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Authors:  Samantha Truong; Jimena Villar de Onis; Alexa Lindley; Rodrigo Bazúa; Andrea Reyes; Mariana Montaño; Leanne Marcotrigiano; Rose L Molina
Journal:  Int J Reprod Med       Date:  2020-01-29

4.  Comparing public and private hospitals in China: evidence from Guangdong.

Authors:  Karen Eggleston; Mingshan Lu; Congdong Li; Jian Wang; Zhe Yang; Jing Zhang; Hude Quan
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Strategies that promote high quality care in Indonesia.

Authors:  Sarah L Barber; Paul J Gertler
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  Factors influencing the utilisation of antenatal care content in Uganda.

Authors:  Bbaale Edward
Journal:  Australas Med J       Date:  2011-09-30

7.  Inequalities in advice provided by public health workers to women during antenatal sessions in rural India.

Authors:  Abhishek Singh; Saseendran Pallikadavath; Faujdar Ram; Reuben Ogollah
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Empowering women to obtain high quality care: evidence from an evaluation of Mexico's conditional cash transfer programme.

Authors:  Sarah L Barber; Paul J Gertler
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 3.547

9.  Learning effect of a conditional cash transfer programme on poor rural women's selection of delivery care in Mexico.

Authors:  Sandra G Sosa-Rubí; Dilys Walker; Edson Serván; Sergio Bautista-Arredondo
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 3.547

Review 10.  Quality of private and public ambulatory health care in low and middle income countries: systematic review of comparative studies.

Authors:  Sima Berendes; Peter Heywood; Sandy Oliver; Paul Garner
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.