Literature DB >> 17389474

The effectiveness of low-vision rehabilitation on participation in daily living and quality of life.

Ecosse L Lamoureux1, Julie F Pallant, Konrad Pesudovs, Gwyn Rees, Jennifer B Hassell, Jill E Keeffe.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary low-vision rehabilitation program on quality of life evaluated by the Impact of Vision Impairment (IVI) instrument.
METHODS: First-time referrals to low-vision clinics were assessed before and after rehabilitation (3-6 months). Rasch analysis was used to estimate the three IVI subscale and overall values on an interval scale. A mixed between-within subjects ANOVA was used to identify whether presenting visual acuity had an interaction effect with rehabilitation change. Cohen d values were used to estimate the magnitude of the change and the standardized response mean (SRM) procedure was selected to determine the clinical significance of the rehabilitation-induced changes.
RESULTS: One hundred twenty-four women and 68 men (mean age, 80.3 years) completed the rehabilitation. Most had age-related macular degeneration (62%, 119) and were moderately to severely vision impaired (<6/18; 78%, 149). After rehabilitation, significant improvements were recorded for the overall IVI score (P = 0.006) and two subscales: reading and accessing information and emotional well-being (P = 0.007 and 0.009, respectively). No significant improvement was found on the mobility and independence subscale (P = 0.07). The magnitude of the post-intervention improvement was found to be relatively moderate (Cohen d = 0.17-0.30) and clinically modest (SRM = 0.22-0.42).
CONCLUSIONS: Significant improvements in overall quality of life and two specific areas of daily living in people with low vision were found, although the magnitude and clinical significance of the rehabilitation-induced gains were modest. Further investigation in other models of low-vision rehabilitation is needed to optimize quality of life gains in people with low vision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17389474     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.06-0610

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  29 in total

1.  Optimizing measurement of vision-related quality of life: a computerized adaptive test for the impact of vision impairment questionnaire (IVI-CAT).

Authors:  Eva K Fenwick; Bao Sheng Loe; Jyoti Khadka; Ryan E K Man; Gwyn Rees; Ecosse L Lamoureux
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  Evidence-based review of interventions for medically at-risk older drivers.

Authors:  Sherrilene Classen; Miriam Monahan; Beth Auten; Abraham Yarney
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug

3.  Adding access to a video magnifier to standard vision rehabilitation: initial results on reading performance and well-being from a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Mary Lou Jackson; Kimberly A Schoessow; Alexandra Selivanova; Jennifer Wallis
Journal:  Digit J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-03-31

4.  Reducing respondent burden: validation of the Brief Impact of Vision Impairment questionnaire.

Authors:  Eva K Fenwick; Ryan E K Man; Gwyn Rees; Jill Keeffe; Tien Y Wong; Ecosse L Lamoureux
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Longitudinal relationships among visual acuity and tasks of everyday life: the Salisbury Eye Evaluation study.

Authors:  Byron L Lam; Sharon L Christ; D Diane Zheng; Sheila K West; Beatriz E Munoz; Bonnielin K Swenor; David J Lee
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Age-related macular degeneration: current treatments.

Authors:  Jean Pierre Hubschman; Shantan Reddy; Steven D Schwartz
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-06-02

Review 7.  Patient-Centered Outcome Measures to Assess Functioning in Randomized Controlled Trials of Low-Vision Rehabilitation: A Review.

Authors:  Joshua R Ehrlich; George L Spaeth; Noelle E Carlozzi; Paul P Lee
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.883

8.  Comparison of clinician-predicted to measured low vision outcomes.

Authors:  Tiffany L Chan; Judith E Goldstein; Robert W Massof
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Interpretation of low-vision rehabilitation outcome measures.

Authors:  Robert W Massof; Joan A Stelmack
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 10.  Critical issues in implementing low vision care in the Asia-Pacific region.

Authors:  Peggy Pei-Chia Chiang; Manjula Marella; Gail Ormsby; Jill Keeffe
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.848

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.