Literature DB >> 1738926

The incidence and impact of early rejection episodes on graft outcome in recipients of first cadaver kidney transplants.

A C Gulanikar1, A S MacDonald, U Sungurtekin, P Belitsky.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to define the incidence and significance of acute rejection occurring in the first year following transplantation. The influence of contemporary induction immunosuppression on rejection, as well as the effect of rejection on graft and patient loss, renal function, and maintenance immunosuppression during the first year in 110 recipients of first cadaver renal transplants were analyzed. All patients received CsA, Aza, and prednisone for 30 days with withdrawal of Aza at 30 days and then prednisone at 105 days; 57 patients were prospectively randomized to receive ALG (Merieux) until serum creatinine was less than 300 mumol/L. Short-term ALG administration did not influence the incidence, severity, nature, or outcome of rejection episodes. Fifty-five (50%) patients had at least 1 rejection in the first 90 days. All patients with delayed graft function and 7/8 (88%) sensitized patients (current PRA greater than 50%) had at least 1 rejection episode; 71% (n = 35) of all rejection episodes occurred in the first 30 days posttransplant. Patients rejection free at 90 days remained rejection free the entire first year. Graft loss was 18% for rejections in the first month, 13% for rejections occurring later (P = NS); 20% (n = 11) of patients had a second rejection and 1% (n = 2) had a third rejection. The risk of graft loss was 9% with a first rejection, 38% with a second rejection, and 50% with a third rejection. Of 12 (22%) rejections that were steroid resistant, 10 (83%) were reversed with OKT3. One-year graft survival for patients without rejection, with steroid-sensitive rejection, and with steroid-resistant rejection was 96%, 88% (P = ns), and 58% (P less than 0.001), respectively; 1 year SCr was 168 +/- 93, 196 +/- 77 (P = ns), and 268 +/- 96 microMol/L (P less than 0.05), respectively. Patients free of rejection and with stable renal function continued to do well on maintenance CsA monotherapy, and they were more likely to be on CsA monotherapy than those with rejection episodes (P less than 0.01).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1738926     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199202010-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  17 in total

1.  Characterization of renal allograft rejection by urinary proteomic analysis.

Authors:  William Clarke; Benjamin C Silverman; Zhen Zhang; Daniel W Chan; Andrew S Klein; Ernesto P Molmenti
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Biological mechanism analysis of acute renal allograft rejection: integrated of mRNA and microRNA expression profiles.

Authors:  Shi-Ming Huang; Xia Zhao; Xue-Mei Zhao; Xiao-Ying Wang; Shan-Shan Li; Yu-Hui Zhu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-12-15

3.  Does mycophenolate mofetil decrease the recurrent acute rejection in renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  Aneesh Srivastava; Vishwajeet Singh; Devendra Kumar; Anant Kumar; R K Sharma
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Causes of long-term graft failure in renal transplantation.

Authors:  K Tanabe; K Takahashi; H Toma
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Shotgun proteomics identifies proteins specific for acute renal transplant rejection.

Authors:  Tara K Sigdel; Amit Kaushal; Marina Gritsenko; Angela D Norbeck; Wei-Jun Qian; Wenzhong Xiao; David G Camp; Richard D Smith; Minnie M Sarwal
Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Cost-effectiveness model of cytomegalovirus management strategies in renal transplantation. Comparing valaciclovir prophylaxis with current practice.

Authors:  J A Mauskopf; A Richter; L Annemans; G Maclaine
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Effects of brain death and hemodynamic status on function and immunologic activation of the potential donor liver in the rat.

Authors:  J A van Der Hoeven; G J Ter Horst; G Molema; P de Vos; A R Girbes; F Postema; R L Freund; J Wiersema; R van Schilfgaarde; R J Ploeg
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 8.  Combating chronic renal allograft dysfunction : optimal immunosuppressive regimens.

Authors:  Pierre Merville
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 9.  Renal transplantation in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Nicole A Weimert; Rita R Alloway
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Comparison of FK-506 and cyclosporine regimens in pediatric renal transplantation.

Authors:  D Ellis; R Shapiro; M L Jordan; V P Scantlebury; N Gilboa; L Hopp; N Weichler; A G Tzakis; R L Simmons
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.