Literature DB >> 17388479

Computer simulations and analysis of structural and energetic features of some crystalline energetic materials.

Craig J Eckhardt1, Angelo Gavezzotti.   

Abstract

A database of 43 literature X-ray crystal structure determinations for compounds with known, or possible, energetic properties has been collected along with some sublimation enthalpies. A statistical study of these crystal structures, when compared to a sample of general organic crystals, reveals a population of anomalously short intermolecular oxygen-oxygen separations with an average crystal packing coefficient of 0.77 that differs significantly from 0.70 found for the general population. For the calculation of lattice energies, three atom-atom potential energy schemes and the semiempirical SCDS-PIXEL scheme are compared. The nature of the packing forces in these energetic materials is further analyzed by a study of the dispersive versus Coulombic contributions to overall lattice energies and to molecule-molecule energies in pairs of near neighbors in the crystals, a partitioning made possible by the unique features of the SCDS-PIXEL scheme. It is shown that dispersion forces are stronger than Coulombic forces, contrary to common belief. The low abundance of hydrogen atoms in these molecules, the close oxygen-oxygen contacts, and the high packing coefficients explain the observation that, for these energetic materials, crystal densities are anomalously high compared to those of most organic materials. However, an understanding, not to mention prediction or control, of the deeper mechanisms for the explosive power of these crystalline materials, such as the role of lattice defects, remains beyond present capabilities.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 17388479     DOI: 10.1021/jp0669299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  11 in total

Review 1.  Classical electrostatics for biomolecular simulations.

Authors:  G Andrés Cisneros; Mikko Karttunen; Pengyu Ren; Celeste Sagui
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  Sensitivity and the available free space per molecule in the unit cell.

Authors:  Miroslav Pospíšil; Pavel Vávra; Monica C Concha; Jane S Murray; Peter Politzer
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 1.810

3.  Some molecular/crystalline factors that affect the sensitivities of energetic materials: molecular surface electrostatic potentials, lattice free space and maximum heat of detonation per unit volume.

Authors:  Peter Politzer; Jane S Murray
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 1.810

4.  Impact sensitivity and crystal lattice compressibility/free space.

Authors:  Peter Politzer; Jane S Murray
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 1.810

5.  A method for fast safety screening of explosives in terms of crystal packing and molecular stability.

Authors:  Xiaohua Hu; Nana Chen; Weichen Li
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 1.810

6.  Theoretical studies on the stability, detonation performance and possibility of synthesis of the nitro derivatives of epoxyethane.

Authors:  Xueli Zhang; Xuedong Gong
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 1.810

7.  QM/MM Simulations with the Gaussian Electrostatic Model: A Density-based Polarizable Potential.

Authors:  Hatice Gökcan; Eric Kratz; Thomas A Darden; Jean-Philip Piquemal; G Andrés Cisneros
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 6.475

8.  Ewald-based methods for Gaussian integral evaluation: application to a new parameterization of GEM.

Authors:  Robert E Duke; G Andrés Cisneros
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 1.810

9.  Conformational polymorphism in a heteromolecular single crystal leads to concerted movement akin to collective rack-and-pinion gears at the molecular level.

Authors:  Anatoliy N Sokolov; Dale C Swenson; Leonard R MacGillivray
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  GEM*: A Molecular Electronic Density-Based Force Field for Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Authors:  Robert E Duke; Oleg N Starovoytov; Jean-Philip Piquemal; G Andrés Cisneros
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 6.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.