| Literature DB >> 17387554 |
Kimberly Voll1, Stella Atkins, Bruce Forster.
Abstract
Despite the potential to dominate radiology reporting, current speech recognition technology is thus far a weak and inconsistent alternative to traditional human transcription. This is attributable to poor accuracy rates, in spite of vendor claims, and the wasted resources that go into correcting erroneous reports. A solution to this problem is post-speech-recognition error detection that will assist the radiologist in proofreading more efficiently. In this paper, we present a statistical method for error detection that can be applied after transcription. The results are encouraging, showing an error detection rate as high as 96% in some cases.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2008 PMID: 17387554 PMCID: PMC3043851 DOI: 10.1007/s10278-007-9034-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Digit Imaging ISSN: 0897-1889 Impact factor: 4.056