BACKGROUND: In view of the large number of families engaged in caregiving, this study was initiated to describe informal cancer care provision from the perspective of the caregiver. METHODS: A professional data collection site was used to convene focus groups in four cities. Participants included 63 caregivers, 87% of whom were female, mean age of 56 years. Caregivers responded to an open-ended question regarding the challenges of providing care. The study utilized qualitative analysis of verbatim transcripts. Transcript coding with four independent raters, using an iterative process, achieved a high inter-rater reliability. RESULTS: The project elucidates self-reported concerns confronted in cancer caregiving. Five primary themes emerged: supportive care demands, emotional toll, impact on health status, coping strategies, and rewards and affirmation. Providing supportive care introduced a balancing act in caregivers' lives as they attempted to address complex and overlapping roles. They felt alone in their decisions, were under-prepared for tasks they assumed, and tried to shield the care recipient. CONCLUSIONS: This qualitative approach confirmed past research while identifying novel concepts related to maintaining well-being and a sense of purpose despite caregiving hardships. Some aspects of caregiver suffering were identified. Caregiver self-regulation strategies revealed by this work suggest ideas for psychosocial interventions caregivers could use to protect themselves and the care recipient from impending distress.
BACKGROUND: In view of the large number of families engaged in caregiving, this study was initiated to describe informal cancer care provision from the perspective of the caregiver. METHODS: A professional data collection site was used to convene focus groups in four cities. Participants included 63 caregivers, 87% of whom were female, mean age of 56 years. Caregivers responded to an open-ended question regarding the challenges of providing care. The study utilized qualitative analysis of verbatim transcripts. Transcript coding with four independent raters, using an iterative process, achieved a high inter-rater reliability. RESULTS: The project elucidates self-reported concerns confronted in cancer caregiving. Five primary themes emerged: supportive care demands, emotional toll, impact on health status, coping strategies, and rewards and affirmation. Providing supportive care introduced a balancing act in caregivers' lives as they attempted to address complex and overlapping roles. They felt alone in their decisions, were under-prepared for tasks they assumed, and tried to shield the care recipient. CONCLUSIONS: This qualitative approach confirmed past research while identifying novel concepts related to maintaining well-being and a sense of purpose despite caregiving hardships. Some aspects of caregiver suffering were identified. Caregiver self-regulation strategies revealed by this work suggest ideas for psychosocial interventions caregivers could use to protect themselves and the care recipient from impending distress.
Authors: Daiming Xiu; Yat-Lui Fung; Bobo Hi-Po Lau; Daniel F K Wong; Celia H Y Chan; Rainbow T H Ho; Tsz-Him So; Tai-Chung Lam; Victor Ho-Fun Lee; Anne W M Lee; Sau Fong Chow; Fai Man Lim; Miu Wah Tsang; Cecilia L W Chan; Amy Y M Chow Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-07-06 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Catherine A Marshall; Linda K Larkey; Melissa A Curran; Karen L Weihs; Terry A Badger; Julie Armin; Francisco García Journal: Fam Syst Health Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 1.950
Authors: Michelle Y Martin; Sara Sanders; Joan M Griffin; Robert A Oster; Christine Ritchie; Sean M Phelan; Audie A Atienza; Katherine Kahn; Michelle van Ryn Journal: Cancer Nurs Date: 2012 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.592
Authors: Loni Ledderer; Karen la Cour; Ole Mogensen; Erik Jakobsen; René Depont Christensen; Jakob Kragstrup; Helle Ploug Hansen Journal: Patient Date: 2013 Impact factor: 3.883
Authors: Eva Mazzotti; Claudia Sebastiani; Gian Carlo Antonini Cappellini; Paolo Marchetti Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2012-12-01 Impact factor: 3.603