Literature DB >> 17387280

The contribution of p53 in the dynamics of cell cycle response to DNA damage interpreted by a mathematical model.

Monica Lupi1, Giada Matera, Claudia Natoli, Valentina Colombo, Paolo Ubezio.   

Abstract

Despite numerous studies on the tumor suppressor p53, a complete picture of its role in cell arrest and killing in G(1), S and G(2)M phases after drug treatment is lacking. We tackled the analysis of the complexity of cell cycle effects combining the time-course measures with different techniques with the aid of a computer program simulating cell cycle progression. This mixed experimental-simulation approach enabled us to decode the dynamics of the cytostatic and cytotoxic responses to cisplatin and doxorubicin treatments in a p53--proficient colon carcinoma cell line (HCT-116) and in its p53-deficient counterpart. We achieved a separate evaluation of the activity of each cell cycle control and we connected these results with measures of p53 level in G(1), S and G(2)M. We confirmed the action of p53 in all cell cycle phases, but also the presence of strong p53-independent cytostatic and cytotoxic activities exerted by both drugs. In G(1) phase, p53 was responsible for a medium/long term block, distinct from the short-term block, which was p53-independent. The delay in traversing S phase was reduced by the presence of p53. In G(2)M phase, despite a strong p53-independent block, there was a weaker but more persistent p53-dependent block. At cytotoxic concentrations, p53-dependent and p53-independent cell death was observed. The former was poorly phase-specific, occurred earlier and exploited the apoptotic mechanism more than p53-independent death. Computer simulation produced a framework where previous partial and sometimes apparently contradictory observations of the p53-mediated effects could be reconciled and explained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17387280     DOI: 10.4161/cc.6.8.4103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Cycle        ISSN: 1551-4005            Impact factor:   4.534


  7 in total

1.  Analysis of radiation-induced changes to human melanoma cultures using a mathematical model.

Authors:  B Basse; W R Joseph; E S Marshall; B C Baguley
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 6.831

2.  Beyond The T/C Ratio: Old And New Anticancer Activity Scores In Vivo.

Authors:  Paolo Ubezio
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 3.989

3.  Decreased transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair capacity is associated with increased p53- and MLH1-independent apoptosis in response to cisplatin.

Authors:  Lawton J Stubbert; Jennifer M Smith; Bruce C McKay
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 4.  Targeting prostate cancer based on signal transduction and cell cycle pathways.

Authors:  John T Lee; Brian D Lehmann; David M Terrian; William H Chappell; Franca Stivala; Massimo Libra; Alberto M Martelli; Linda S Steelman; James A McCubrey
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2008-06-16       Impact factor: 4.534

5.  Integrated experimental and simulation study of the response to sequential treatment with erlotinib and gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Paolo Ubezio; Francesca Falcetta; Laura Carrassa; Monica Lupi
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-03-29

6.  Doxorubicin blocks proliferation of cancer cells through proteolytic activation of CREB3L1.

Authors:  Bray Denard; Ching Lee; Jin Ye
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Dynamic rendering of the heterogeneous cell response to anticancer treatments.

Authors:  Francesca Falcetta; Monica Lupi; Valentina Colombo; Paolo Ubezio
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 4.475

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.