Timothy S Olds1, Kate Ridley, Grant R Tomkinson. 1. Nutritional Physiology Research Centre School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Abstract
AIMS: This study quantifies the cross-sectional and longitudinal relationships between young people's fatness (BMI, skinfold thickness) and fitness (performance on tests of aerobic fitness). BACKGROUND: Over the last 20-30 years, young people have become fatter and less fit. It is likely that the decline in fitness is largely due to increases in fatness. There are strong mechanistic connections; within cohorts, variability in fatness accounts for about 20% of variability in running performance; there is a strong correlation between overweight prevalence and relative fitness across specific cohorts from different countries; and secular declines in fitness coincide temporally with increases in BMI. METHODS: Australians aged 10-12 years tested in 1985 were matched for age, sex, BMI and triceps skinfold thickness with their counterparts tested in 1997 (n = 279 matched pairs), and 12-15 year-old tested in 1995-1996 were matched with their counterparts tested in 1999-2000 (n = 2,834 matched pairs). Performance differences on running tests in the matched datasets were compared with performance differences in the complete (unmatched) datasets. RESULTS: Performance differences persisted even when young people were matched for fatness. Matching for fatness reduced overall performance differentials by 29-61%. Other factors such as reduced physical activity and subsequent training effect are likely to have contributed to the decline.
AIMS: This study quantifies the cross-sectional and longitudinal relationships between young people's fatness (BMI, skinfold thickness) and fitness (performance on tests of aerobic fitness). BACKGROUND: Over the last 20-30 years, young people have become fatter and less fit. It is likely that the decline in fitness is largely due to increases in fatness. There are strong mechanistic connections; within cohorts, variability in fatness accounts for about 20% of variability in running performance; there is a strong correlation between overweight prevalence and relative fitness across specific cohorts from different countries; and secular declines in fitness coincide temporally with increases in BMI. METHODS: Australians aged 10-12 years tested in 1985 were matched for age, sex, BMI and triceps skinfold thickness with their counterparts tested in 1997 (n = 279 matched pairs), and 12-15 year-old tested in 1995-1996 were matched with their counterparts tested in 1999-2000 (n = 2,834 matched pairs). Performance differences on running tests in the matched datasets were compared with performance differences in the complete (unmatched) datasets. RESULTS: Performance differences persisted even when young people were matched for fatness. Matching for fatness reduced overall performance differentials by 29-61%. Other factors such as reduced physical activity and subsequent training effect are likely to have contributed to the decline.
Authors: Nicholas R Lamoureux; John S Fitzgerald; Kevin I Norton; Todd Sabato; Mark S Tremblay; Grant R Tomkinson Journal: Sports Med Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Michael J Hamlin; Meegan Fraser; Catherine A Lizamore; Nick Draper; Jeremy P Shearman; Nicholas E Kimber Journal: J Hum Kinet Date: 2014-04-09 Impact factor: 2.193