Literature DB >> 17386916

The evolution of the doctor-patient relationship.

R Kaba1, P Sooriakumaran.   

Abstract

The doctor-patient relationship has undergone a transition throughout the ages. Prior to the last two decades, the relationship was predominantly between a patient seeking help and a doctor whose decisions were silently complied with by the patient. In this paternalistic model of the doctor-patient relationship, the doctor utilises his skills to choose the necessary interventions and treatments most likely to restore the patient's health or ameliorate his pain. Any information given to the patient is selected to encourage them to consent to the doctor's decisions. This description of the asymmetrical or imbalanced interaction between doctor and patient [Parsons T. The social system. Free Press, New York, 1951.](1) has been challenged during the last 20 years. Critics have proposed a more active, autonomous and thus patient-centred role for the patient who advocates greater patient control, reduced physician dominance, and more mutual participation. This patient-centred approach has been described as one where "the physician tries to enter the patient's world, to see the illness through the patient's eyes" [McWhinney I. The need for a transformed clinical method. In: Stewart M, Roter D, Communicating with medical patients. London: Sage, 1989.](2), and has become the predominant model in clinical practice today.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17386916     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2006.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg        ISSN: 1743-9159            Impact factor:   6.071


  68 in total

1.  Impact of the Doctor-Patient Relationship.

Authors:  Fallon E Chipidza; Rachel S Wallwork; Theodore A Stern
Journal:  Prim Care Companion CNS Disord       Date:  2015-10-22

Review 2.  Patient Health Engagement (PHE) model in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS): monitoring patients' engagement and psychological resilience in minimally invasive thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Guendalina Graffigna; Serena Barello
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Shared decision making: a consideration of historical and political contexts.

Authors:  Graham Meadows
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 49.548

4.  Who decides? Shared decision-making among colorectal cancer surgery patients in China.

Authors:  Huiwen Zhai; Christopher Lavender; Cong Li; Haotan Wu; Ni Gong; Yu Cheng
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  'I'm happy that I can still walk'--Participation of the elderly in home care as a specific group with specific needs and wishes.

Authors:  Charlotte Bagchus; Christine Dedding; Joske F G Bunders
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-03-29       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  End-of-Life Decision Making in Palliative Care and Recommendations of the Council of Europe: Qualitative Secondary Analysis of Interviews and Observation Field Notes.

Authors:  Sandra Martins Pereira; Emília Fradique; Pablo Hernández-Marrero
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 2.947

7.  Psychometric assessment of the Health Care Alliance Questionnaire with women in prenatal care.

Authors:  Lee K Roosevelt; Kathryn J Holland; Jan Hiser; Julia S Seng
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2013-10-22

8.  A prospective audit on the validity of written informed consent prior to glaucoma surgery: an Asian perspective.

Authors:  Kui Dong Kang; Aman Shah B Abdul Majid; Jee Hyun Kwag; Yeon Deok Kim; Hye Bin Yim
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Do community pharmacists actively engage elderly patients in the dialogue? Results from pharmaceutical care consultations.

Authors:  João Pelicano-Romano; Mariana R Neves; Ana Amado; Afonso M Cavaco
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  A theoretical framework to describe communication processes during medical disability assessment interviews.

Authors:  H Jolanda van Rijssen; Antonius J M Schellart; Johannes R Anema; Allard J van der Beek
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.