OBJECTIVE: To explore the type and frequency of oral care practices in European ICUs and the attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge of health care workers. DESIGN: An anonymous questionnaire was distributed to representatives of European ICUs. Results were obtained from 59 ICUs (one questionnaire per ICU) in seven countries 91% of respondents were registered nurses. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Of the respondents 77% reported that they had received adequate training on providing oral care; most (93%) also expressed the desire to learn more about oral care. Oral care was perceived to be high priority in mechanically ventilated patients (88%). Cleaning the oral cavity was considered difficult by 68%, and unpleasant as well as difficult by 32%. In 37% of cases respondents felt that despite their efforts oral health worsens over time in intubated patients. Oral care practices are carried out once daily (20%), twice (31%) or three times (37%). Oral care consists principally of mouth washes (88%), mostly performed with chlorhexidine (61%). Foam swabs (22%) and moisture agents (42%) are used less frequently as well as manual toothbrushes (41%) although the literature indicates that these are more effective for thorough cleaning of the oral cavity. Electric toothbrushes were never used. CONCLUSIONS: In European ICUs oral care is considered very important. It is experienced as a task that is difficult to perform, and that does not necessarily succeed in ensuring oral health in patients with prolonged intubation. Oral care consists primarily of mouth washes. The use of toothbrushes should be given more attention.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the type and frequency of oral care practices in European ICUs and the attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge of health care workers. DESIGN: An anonymous questionnaire was distributed to representatives of European ICUs. Results were obtained from 59 ICUs (one questionnaire per ICU) in seven countries 91% of respondents were registered nurses. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Of the respondents 77% reported that they had received adequate training on providing oral care; most (93%) also expressed the desire to learn more about oral care. Oral care was perceived to be high priority in mechanically ventilated patients (88%). Cleaning the oral cavity was considered difficult by 68%, and unpleasant as well as difficult by 32%. In 37% of cases respondents felt that despite their efforts oral health worsens over time in intubated patients. Oral care practices are carried out once daily (20%), twice (31%) or three times (37%). Oral care consists principally of mouth washes (88%), mostly performed with chlorhexidine (61%). Foam swabs (22%) and moisture agents (42%) are used less frequently as well as manual toothbrushes (41%) although the literature indicates that these are more effective for thorough cleaning of the oral cavity. Electric toothbrushes were never used. CONCLUSIONS: In European ICUs oral care is considered very important. It is experienced as a task that is difficult to perform, and that does not necessarily succeed in ensuring oral health in patients with prolonged intubation. Oral care consists primarily of mouth washes. The use of toothbrushes should be given more attention.
Authors: Jonathan A T Sandoe; Ian R Witherden; Ho-Kong C Au-Yeung; Peter Kite; Kevin G Kerr; Mark H Wilcox Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: E Anaissie; G P Bodey; H Kantarjian; C David; K Barnett; E Bow; R Defelice; N Downs; T File; G Karam Journal: Am J Med Date: 1991-08 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Massimo Antonelli; Elie Azoulay; Marc Bonten; Jean Chastre; Giuseppe Citerio; Giorgio Conti; Daniel De Backer; François Lemaire; Herwig Gerlach; Johan Groeneveld; Goran Hedenstierna; Duncan Macrae; Jordi Mancebo; Salvatore M Maggiore; Alexandre Mebazaa; Philipp Metnitz; Jerme Pugin; Jan Wernerman; Haibo Zhang Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2008-01-31 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Nancy J Ames; Pawel Sulima; Jan M Yates; Linda McCullagh; Sherri L Gollins; Karen Soeken; Gwenyth R Wallen Journal: Am J Crit Care Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 2.228
Authors: L Lorente; M Lecuona; A Jiménez; S Palmero; E Pastor; N Lafuente; M J Ramos; M L Mora; A Sierra Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2012-03-16 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: Irene P Jongerden; Anne Marie G de Smet; Jan A Kluytmans; Leo F te Velde; Paul J Dennesen; Ronald M Wesselink; Martijn P Bouw; Rob Spanjersberg; Diana Bogaers-Hofman; Nardo J van der Meer; Jaap W de Vries; Karin Kaasjager; Mat van Iterson; Georg H Kluge; Tjip S van der Werf; Hubertus I Harinck; Alexander J Bindels; Peter Pickkers; Marc J Bonten Journal: Crit Care Date: 2010-07-13 Impact factor: 9.097