K K Konrad1, R A Carels, D M Garner. 1. Department of Psychology, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH 43403, USA. kkonrad@bgnet.bgsu.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine resting metabolic rate (RMR) and psychological changes during refeeding in 10 women with anorexia nervosa participating in a partial hospitalization eating disorder program. RESULTS: Participants' admission RMRs, as assessed by the MedGem Analyzer, were below their RMRs predicted by the Harris- Benedict equation, t(1,9)=5.77, p<0.01. Correlational analyses revealed a trend toward smaller increases in RMR being associated with higher admission BMI (r=-0.49, p=0.08), but not with highest lifetime BMI. Over the course of treatment, RMR per pound of Fat-Free Mass (FFM) increased from the beginning to the middle, t(1,9)=-3.02, p<0.05, and to the end stage of treatment, t(1,9)=-2.53, p<0.05. Scores on the Eating Attitudes Test-26, Eating Disorder Inventory-2, Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), BSI Depression subscale, and Mizes Anorectic Cognitions scale significantly improved throughout treatment (all p<0.05); however, body dissatisfaction did not improve. DISCUSSION: Results suggest that weight restoration programs for anorexia nervosa cannot rely on FFM or standard formulas to predict caloric needs throughout refeeding, and that admission BMI is one factor to be considered in predicting caloric needs during refeeding. Furthermore, ways to improve body dissatisfaction during refeeding needs to be more of a treatment focus.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine resting metabolic rate (RMR) and psychological changes during refeeding in 10 women with anorexia nervosa participating in a partial hospitalization eating disorder program. RESULTS:Participants' admission RMRs, as assessed by the MedGem Analyzer, were below their RMRs predicted by the Harris- Benedict equation, t(1,9)=5.77, p<0.01. Correlational analyses revealed a trend toward smaller increases in RMR being associated with higher admission BMI (r=-0.49, p=0.08), but not with highest lifetime BMI. Over the course of treatment, RMR per pound of Fat-Free Mass (FFM) increased from the beginning to the middle, t(1,9)=-3.02, p<0.05, and to the end stage of treatment, t(1,9)=-2.53, p<0.05. Scores on the Eating Attitudes Test-26, Eating Disorder Inventory-2, Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), BSI Depression subscale, and Mizes Anorectic Cognitions scale significantly improved throughout treatment (all p<0.05); however, body dissatisfaction did not improve. DISCUSSION: Results suggest that weight restoration programs for anorexia nervosa cannot rely on FFM or standard formulas to predict caloric needs throughout refeeding, and that admission BMI is one factor to be considered in predicting caloric needs during refeeding. Furthermore, ways to improve body dissatisfaction during refeeding needs to be more of a treatment focus.
Authors: J Schebendach; N H Golden; M S Jacobson; M Arden; M Pettei; D Hardoff; N Bauman; P Reichert; N Copperman; S Hertz Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 1995-01 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: Giovanni Castellini; Walter Castellani; Lorenzo Lelli; Carolina Lo Sauro; Carla Dini; Lisa Lazzeretti; Lorenza Bencini; Edoardo Mannucci; Valdo Ricca Journal: World J Clin Cases Date: 2014-07-16 Impact factor: 1.337
Authors: David R Hooper; Jared Mallard; Jeff T Wight; Kara L Conway; George G A Pujalte; Kelsey M Pontius; Catherine Saenz; Anthony C Hackney; Adam S Tenforde; Kathryn E Ackerman Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Date: 2021-05-12 Impact factor: 5.555
Authors: Rebecca J Mallinson; Nancy I Williams; Marion P Olmsted; Jennifer L Scheid; Emily S Riddle; Mary Jane De Souza Journal: J Int Soc Sports Nutr Date: 2013-08-02 Impact factor: 5.150