BACKGROUND: High dose chemotherapy with autologous transplantation of bone marrow or peripheral stem cells (autograft) has been considered promising for treating poor prognosis breast cancer. We reviewed the relevant evidence. METHODS: We included randomised controlled trials comparing high dose chemotherapy and autograft with conventional chemotherapy for women with early poor prognosis breast cancer. We searched medical databases (Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE), websites (co-operative cancer research groups, American Society of Clinical Oncologists) and citations of articles found, to September 2006. Where appropriate, data were pooled to obtain a relative risk, using a fixed effects model. Clinical, methodological and statistical heterogeneity were examined with sensitivity analyses. FINDINGS: Thirteen trials with 5064 women were included. There was a significant benefit in event-free survival for the high dose group at three years (RR 1.19 (95% CI 1.06, 1.19)) and four years (RR 1.24 (95% CI 1.03, 1.50)) and at five years this benefit approached statistical significance (RR 1.06 (95% CI 1.00, 1.13)). Overall survival rates were not significantly different at any stage of follow up. There were significantly more treatment-related deaths on the high dose arm (RR 8.58 (95% CI 4.13, 17.80)). Morbidity was higher in the high dose group but there was no significant difference in the incidence of second cancers. The high dose group reported significantly worse quality of life immediately after treatment, but there were few differences by one year. INTERPRETATION: There is insufficient evidence supporting routine use of high dose chemotherapy with autograft for treating early poor prognosis breast cancer.
BACKGROUND: High dose chemotherapy with autologous transplantation of bone marrow or peripheral stem cells (autograft) has been considered promising for treating poor prognosis breast cancer. We reviewed the relevant evidence. METHODS: We included randomised controlled trials comparing high dose chemotherapy and autograft with conventional chemotherapy for women with early poor prognosis breast cancer. We searched medical databases (Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE), websites (co-operative cancer research groups, American Society of Clinical Oncologists) and citations of articles found, to September 2006. Where appropriate, data were pooled to obtain a relative risk, using a fixed effects model. Clinical, methodological and statistical heterogeneity were examined with sensitivity analyses. FINDINGS: Thirteen trials with 5064 women were included. There was a significant benefit in event-free survival for the high dose group at three years (RR 1.19 (95% CI 1.06, 1.19)) and four years (RR 1.24 (95% CI 1.03, 1.50)) and at five years this benefit approached statistical significance (RR 1.06 (95% CI 1.00, 1.13)). Overall survival rates were not significantly different at any stage of follow up. There were significantly more treatment-related deaths on the high dose arm (RR 8.58 (95% CI 4.13, 17.80)). Morbidity was higher in the high dose group but there was no significant difference in the incidence of second cancers. The high dose group reported significantly worse quality of life immediately after treatment, but there were few differences by one year. INTERPRETATION: There is insufficient evidence supporting routine use of high dose chemotherapy with autograft for treating early poor prognosis breast cancer.
Authors: A VanderWalde; W Ye; P Frankel; D Asuncion; L Leong; T Luu; R Morgan; P Twardowski; M Koczywas; R Pezner; I B Paz; K Margolin; J Wong; J H Doroshow; S Forman; S Shibata; G Somlo Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2012-02-02 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Donald A Berry; Naoto T Ueno; Marcella M Johnson; Xiudong Lei; Jean Caputo; Sjoerd Rodenhuis; William P Peters; Robert C Leonard; William E Barlow; Martin S Tallman; Jonas Bergh; Ulrike A Nitz; Alessandro M Gianni; Russell L Basser; Axel R Zander; R Charles Coombes; Henri Roché; Yutaka Tokuda; Elisabeth G E de Vries; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; John P Crown; Paolo Pedrazzoli; Marco Bregni; Taner Demirer Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-07-18 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Claude Sportès; Seth M Steinberg; David J Liewehr; Juan Gea-Banacloche; David N Danforth; Daniele N Avila; Kelly E Bryant; Michael C Krumlauf; Daniel H Fowler; Steven Pavletic; Nancy M Hardy; Michael R Bishop; Ronald E Gress Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Philip L McCarthy; Theresa Hahn; Anna Hassebroek; Christopher Bredeson; James Gajewski; Gregory Hale; Luis Isola; Hillard M Lazarus; Stephanie J Lee; Charles F Lemaistre; Fausto Loberiza; Richard T Maziarz; J Douglas Rizzo; Steven Joffe; Susan Parsons; Navneet S Majhail Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2013-05-06 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Marieke A Vollebergh; Esther H Lips; Petra M Nederlof; Lodewyk F A Wessels; Jelle Wesseling; Marc J Vd Vijver; Elisabeth G E de Vries; Harm van Tinteren; Jos Jonkers; Michael Hauptmann; Sjoerd Rodenhuis; Sabine C Linn Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2014-05-15 Impact factor: 6.466