OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the 6-minute walking distance (6MWD) for healthy Caucasian children and adolescents of a population-based sample from the age of 3 to 18 years. STUDY DESIGN: Two hundred and eighty boys and 248 girls completed a modified test, using a measuring wheel as incentive device. RESULTS: Median 6MWD increased from the age of 3 to 11 years in boys and girls alike and increased further with increasing age in boys (from 667.3 m to 727.6 m), whereas it essentially plateaued in girls (655.8 m to 660.9 m). After adjusting for age, height (P = .001 in boys and P < .001 in girls) remained independently correlated with the 6MWD. In the best fitting and most efficient linear and quadratic regression models, the variables age and height explained about 49% of the variability of the 6MWD in boys and 50% in girls. CONCLUSION: This modified 6-minute walk test (6MWT) proved to be safe, easy to perform, and highly acceptable to children. It provides a simple and inexpensive means to measure functional exercise capacity in children, even of young age, and might be of value when conducting comparable studies.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the 6-minute walking distance (6MWD) for healthy Caucasian children and adolescents of a population-based sample from the age of 3 to 18 years. STUDY DESIGN: Two hundred and eighty boys and 248 girls completed a modified test, using a measuring wheel as incentive device. RESULTS: Median 6MWD increased from the age of 3 to 11 years in boys and girls alike and increased further with increasing age in boys (from 667.3 m to 727.6 m), whereas it essentially plateaued in girls (655.8 m to 660.9 m). After adjusting for age, height (P = .001 in boys and P < .001 in girls) remained independently correlated with the 6MWD. In the best fitting and most efficient linear and quadratic regression models, the variables age and height explained about 49% of the variability of the 6MWD in boys and 50% in girls. CONCLUSION: This modified 6-minute walk test (6MWT) proved to be safe, easy to perform, and highly acceptable to children. It provides a simple and inexpensive means to measure functional exercise capacity in children, even of young age, and might be of value when conducting comparable studies.
Authors: Scott M Paul; Lisa R Gabor; Scott Rudzinski; David Giovanni; Alison M Boyce; Marilyn R N Kelly; Michael T Collins Journal: Bone Date: 2013-12-04 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Stanley H Hung; Anne Rankin; Naznin Virji-Babul; Sheila Pritchard; Christopher Fryer; Kristin L Campbell Journal: Physiother Can Date: 2017 Impact factor: 1.037
Authors: Erik A Imel; Francis H Glorieux; Michael P Whyte; Craig F Munns; Leanne M Ward; Ola Nilsson; Jill H Simmons; Raja Padidela; Noriyuki Namba; Hae Il Cheong; Pisit Pitukcheewanont; Etienne Sochett; Wolfgang Högler; Koji Muroya; Hiroyuki Tanaka; Gary S Gottesman; Andrew Biggin; Farzana Perwad; Meng Mao; Chao-Yin Chen; Alison Skrinar; Javier San Martin; Anthony A Portale Journal: Lancet Date: 2019-05-16 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Keren Machol; Trevor D Hadley; Jake Schmidt; David Cuthbertson; Henri Traboulsi; Rodrigo C Silva; Chloe Citron; Sobiah Khan; Kate Citron; Erin Carter; Kenneth Brookler; Jay R Shapiro; Robert D Steiner; Peter H Byers; Francis H Glorieux; Michaela Durigova; Peter Smith; Michael B Bober; Vernon R Sutton; Brendan H Lee; Sandesh C S Nagamani; Cathleen Raggio Journal: Am J Med Genet A Date: 2019-12-26 Impact factor: 2.802