Literature DB >> 17381758

Quantitative analysis of the intestinal bacterial community in one- to three-week-old commercially reared broiler chickens fed conventional or antibiotic-free vegetable-based diets.

M G Wise1, G R Siragusa.   

Abstract

AIMS: To explore the effect of drug-free poultry production on the intestinal microflora of broiler chickens, the bacterial community of this environment was quantitatively profiled in both conventionally reared birds and birds reared without antibiotic growth promotants (AGPs) on a vegetable-based diet. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Quantitative, real-time PCR with group-specific 16S rDNA primer sets was used to enumerate the abundance of the following chicken gastrointestinal (GI) tract phylogenetic groups: the Clostridium leptum-Faecalibacterium prausnitzii subgroup (Clostridium genus cluster IV), the Clostridium coccoides - Eubacterium rectale subgroup (Clostridium cluster XIVa and XIVb), the Bacteroides group (including Prevotella and Porphyromonas), Bifidobacterium spp., the Enterobacteriaceae, the Lactobacillus group (including the genera Leuconostoc, Pediococcus, Aerococcus and Weissella), the Clostridium perfringens subgroup (Clostridium cluster I), Enterococcus spp., Veillonella spp., Atopobium spp., Campylobacter spp. and the domain Bacteria. A species-specific 5'-nuclease (Taqman) assay was also employed to specifically assess Cl. perfringens abundance. Ten birds were sampled from each of two commercial chicken houses, one in which feed was supplemented with AGPs and exogenous animal protein, and the other vegetable-based and drug-free, at 7, 14 and 21 days of age. The ileal community was dominated by two large populations, the lactobacilli and the Enterobacteriaceae, with those taxa much more numerous in drug-free vegetable-based diet fed birds than those conventionally reared at the 7- and 14-day time periods. The progressive changes in microflora in both the conventional and drug-free caeca were similar to each other, with the Enterobacteriaceae sequences dominating at day 7, but being replaced by obligate anaerobe signature sequences by day 14. Of note was the finding that all the day 14 and day 21 replicate caecal samples from the drug-free house were positive for Campylobacter spp. averaging >10(8) 16S rDNA gene copies per gram wet weight.
CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative, real-time PCR indicates that the effects of drug-free rearing on the chicken GI tract microbial community are most pronounced in the ileal region, but AGPs may be important in controlling Campylobacter colonization of the caecum. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: A quantitative taxonomic understanding of the shifting microbial ecology of the broiler chicken gut microbiota is important in the light of AGP withdrawal. AGP withdrawal has occurred in response to concerns over the transfer of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria to humans via the food production chain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17381758     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03153.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 1364-5072            Impact factor:   3.772


  72 in total

1.  Structural shifts of fecal microbial communities in rats with acute rejection after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Yirui Xie; Zhuanbo Luo; Zhengfeng Li; Min Deng; Hao Liu; Biao Zhu; Bing Ruan; Lanjuan Li
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 4.552

Review 2.  From structure to function: the ecology of host-associated microbial communities.

Authors:  Courtney J Robinson; Brendan J M Bohannan; Vincent B Young
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 11.056

3.  Association of dietary type with fecal microbiota in vegetarians and omnivores in Slovenia.

Authors:  Bojana Bogovič Matijašić; Tanja Obermajer; Luka Lipoglavšek; Iztok Grabnar; Gorazd Avguštin; Irena Rogelj
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 5.614

4.  Commensal microbiota is hepatoprotective and prevents liver fibrosis in mice.

Authors:  Magdalena Mazagova; Lirui Wang; Andrew T Anfora; Max Wissmueller; Scott A Lesley; Yukiko Miyamoto; Lars Eckmann; Suraj Dhungana; Wimal Pathmasiri; Susan Sumner; Caroline Westwater; David A Brenner; Bernd Schnabl
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Effect of dietary supplementation with Lactobacillus acidophilus D2/CSL (CECT 4529) on caecum microbioma and productive performance in broiler chickens.

Authors:  Alessandra De Cesare; Federico Sirri; Gerardo Manfreda; Paola Moniaci; Alberto Giardini; Marco Zampiga; Adele Meluzzi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Influence of antimicrobial feed additives on broiler commensal posthatch gut microbiota development and performance.

Authors:  Valeria A Torok; Gwen E Allison; Nigel J Percy; Kathy Ophel-Keller; Robert J Hughes
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 7.  Gut microbial balance and liver transplantation: alteration, management, and prediction.

Authors:  Xinyao Tian; Zhe Yang; Fangzhou Luo; Shusen Zheng
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 4.592

8.  Simultaneous delivery of antibiotics neomycin and ampicillin in drinking water inhibits fermentation of resistant starch in rats.

Authors:  Diana G Carvajal-Aldaz; Justin L Guice; Ryan C Page; Anne M Raggio; Roy J Martin; Claudia Husseneder; Holiday A Durham; James Geaghan; Marlene Janes; Ted Gauthier; Diana Coulon; Michael J Keenan
Journal:  Mol Nutr Food Res       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 5.914

9.  Influence of Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis infection on the development of the cecum microbiota in newly hatched chicks.

Authors:  H Juricova; P Videnska; M Lukac; M Faldynova; V Babak; H Havlickova; F Sisak; I Rychlik
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Cecal microbiome divergence of broiler chickens by sex and body weight.

Authors:  Kyu-Chan Lee; Dong Yong Kil; Woo Jun Sul
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.422

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.