Literature DB >> 17381558

Treatment-emergent CNS symptoms following triptan therapy are part of the attack.

P J Goadsby1, D W Dodick, M Almas, H-C Diener, P Tfelt-Hansen, R B Lipton, B Parsons.   

Abstract

If treatment-emergent central nervous system (CNS) symptoms following triptan therapy represent direct pharmacological effects of the drug, they should occur independent of response to active drug. However, if they represent unmasking of neurological symptoms of the migraine attack after pain is relieved, they should be more common in responders both to active drug and to placebo. To explore this issue, we evaluated the relationship between the CNS adverse events and treatment response following triptan or placebo treatment. We used pooled data from seven double-blind, placebo-controlled trials involving eletriptan 20 mg (E20, n = 402), eletriptan 40 mg (E40, n = 1870), eletriptan 80 mg (E80, n = 1393), sumatriptan 100 mg (S100, n = 275) and placebo (Pbo, n = 1024). Somnolence was more prevalent among 2 h headache responders than non-responders for all treatments, including E80 (8.8% vs. 5.0%; P < 0.05), E40 (6.4% vs. 5.0%; NS), E20 (4.0% vs. 2.0%; NS), S100 (4.7% vs. 3.2%; NS) and Pbo (7.6% vs. 3.0%; P < 0.05). Similarly, the incidence of asthenia was higher among patients who responded to treatment compared with those who did not respond to E80 (15.2% vs. 7.8%; P < 0.05), E40 (6.5% vs. 3.6%; P < 0.05), E20 (6.5% vs. 1.0%; P < 0.05), S100 (10.1% vs. 4.7%; NS) and Pbo (4.4% vs. 2.7%; NS). The generally higher rates of somnolence and asthenia in patients who respond to treatment suggests that these treatment-emergent neurological symptoms may represent the unmasking of CNS symptoms associated with the natural resolution of a migraine attack, rather than simply representing drug-related side-effects. The rate of somnolence in placebo responders is comparable to that in responders to E40 and E80, indicating that somnolence is related, at least in some important part, to headache relief and not treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17381558     DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2007.01278.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cephalalgia        ISSN: 0333-1024            Impact factor:   6.292


  7 in total

Review 1.  Pathophysiology of Migraine: A Disorder of Sensory Processing.

Authors:  Peter J Goadsby; Philip R Holland; Margarida Martins-Oliveira; Jan Hoffmann; Christoph Schankin; Simon Akerman
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 37.312

Review 2.  Does sumatriptan cross the blood-brain barrier in animals and man?

Authors:  Peer Carsten Tfelt-Hansen
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 7.277

Review 3.  What can be learned from the history of recurrence in migraine? A comment.

Authors:  Peer Tfelt-Hansen
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 7.277

4.  Headaches related to triptans therapy in patients of migrainous vertigo.

Authors:  Sanjay Prakash; Bhavana V Chavda; Hiren Mandalia; Rishi Dhawan; Deepak Padmanabhan
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 7.277

Review 5.  Optimal balance of efficacy and tolerability of oral triptans and telcagepant: a review and a clinical comment.

Authors:  Peer Tfelt-Hansen
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 7.277

6.  Phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of lasmiditan for acute treatment of migraine.

Authors:  Peter J Goadsby; Linda A Wietecha; Ellen B Dennehy; Bernice Kuca; Michael G Case; Sheena K Aurora; Charly Gaul
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  The relationship between the reporting of euphoria events and early treatment responses to pregabalin: an exploratory post-hoc analysis.

Authors:  Bruce Parsons; Rainer Freynhagen; Stephan Schug; Ed Whalen; Marie Ortiz; Pritha Bhadra Brown; Lloyd Knapp
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 3.133

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.