Literature DB >> 17381484

Chromosomal mosaicism mitigates stigmata and cardiovascular risk factors in Turner syndrome.

Mostafa El-Mansoury1, Marie-Louise Barrenäs, Inger Bryman, Charles Hanson, Christina Larsson, Lars Wilhelmsen, Kerstin Landin-Wilhelmsen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study genotype-phenotype correlations in Turner syndrome (TS) regarding body composition, cardiovascular risk factors, stigmata and age at diagnosis vs. degree of mosaicism estimated as the percentage of 45,X and 46,XX cells.
METHODS: One hundred and twenty-six TS women, mean age 31 years, were examined by three specialists, who reported stigmata independent of each other. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was used to measure bone mineral density (BMD). The karyotype was blinded. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed on buccal cells. A random population sample served as controls.
RESULTS: Forty-four per cent exhibited a 45,X karyotype and 56% a second-cell line, while 27% of all had a 45,X/46,XX mosaicism. Five 45,X cases with a conventional karyotype were 45,X/46,XX mosaic according to FISH. At diagnosis, 45,X cases were younger (P < 0.05) and had more stigmata per person (P < 0.01) than the mosaics. TS with marker chromosome X or Y, iso or ring, did not differ from 45,X in this aspect. The mosaics had higher BMD and SHBG and lower total cholesterol and FSH than TS with 45,X and did not differ compared with controls in terms of body mass index (BMI), waist/hip ratio, BMD, blood pressure, cholesterol, triglycerides, SHBG, diabetes or osteoporosis. The number of stigmata correlated positively to BMI, waist/hip ratio, cholesterol and %45,X and inversely to height and %46,XX according to FISH.
CONCLUSIONS: Mosaicism seems to mitigate the TS phenotype and the cardiovascular risk factor profile. Mosaics were diagnosed 8 years later than 45,X cases. This emphasizes the necessity for a stricter genotype categorization not only in the clinic but also in research on TS than previously adopted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17381484     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2007.02807.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)        ISSN: 0300-0664            Impact factor:   3.478


  23 in total

Review 1.  Spontaneous arterial dissection: phenotype and molecular pathogenesis.

Authors:  Caspar Grond-Ginsbach; Rastislav Pjontek; Suna Su Aksay; Alexander Hyhlik-Dürr; Dittmar Böckler; Marie-Luise Gross-Weissmann
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2010-02-14       Impact factor: 9.261

2.  Unreliability of aortic size index to predict risk of aortic dissection in a patient with Turner syndrome.

Authors:  Jan Nijs; Sandro Gelsomino; Fabiana Lucà; Orlando Parise; Jos G Maessen; Mark La Meir
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2014-05-26

3.  The proportion of diploid 46,XX cells increases with time in women with Turner syndrome--a 10-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Anna-Maria Denes; Kerstin Landin-Wilhelmsen; Yvonne Wettergren; Inger Bryman; Charles Hanson
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2015-01-14

4.  Upper limb hemimelia in a twin pregnancy which was obtained by an ICSI and PGD in a woman with mosaic Turner's syndrome and the prognosis.

Authors:  Ahter Tanay Tayyar; Ahmet Tayyar; Ahmet Eser; Çetin Kılıçcı; İlter Yenidede; Selçuk Selçuk
Journal:  Organogenesis       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 5.  Fracture risk and bone mineral density in Turner syndrome.

Authors:  Vladimir K Bakalov; Carolyn A Bondy
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 6.514

6.  Single-nucleotide polymorphism array genotyping is equivalent to metaphase cytogenetics for diagnosis of Turner syndrome.

Authors:  Siddharth Prakash; Dongchuan Guo; Cheryl L Maslen; Michael Silberbach; Dianna Milewicz; Carolyn A Bondy
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  Reproductive outcomes after preimplantation genetic testing in mosaic Turner syndrome: a retrospective cohort study of 100 cycles.

Authors:  Jingnan Liao; Keli Luo; Dehua Cheng; Pingyuan Xie; Yueqiu Tan; Liang Hu; Guangxiu Lu; Fei Gong; Ge Lin
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Turner syndrome and the evolution of human sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  Bernard Crespi
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 5.183

9.  Reproductive and obstetric outcomes in mosaic Turner's Syndrome: a cross-sectional study and review of the literature.

Authors:  Emek Doğer; Yiğit Çakıroğlu; Yasin Ceylan; Esen Ulak; Özkan Özdamar; Eray Çalışkan
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 5.211

10.  Body composition and bone mineral status in patients with Turner syndrome.

Authors:  Kun Shi; Li Liu; Yao-Juan He; Duan Li; Lian-Xiong Yuan; Gendie E Lash; Li Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.