Literature DB >> 17380470

Monetary valuation of informal care: the well-being valuation method.

Bernard van den Berg1, Ada Ferrer-I-Carbonell.   

Abstract

This paper estimates the monetary value of providing informal care by means of a well-being valuation method. This is done by assessing the compensating variation necessary to maintain the same level of well-being after an informal caregiver provides an extra hour of informal care. The informal caregiver's well-being is proxied by the answer to two subjective well-being questions that were posed in a questionnaire answered by 865 Dutch informal caregivers between the end of 2001 and the beginning of 2002. In the econometric analysis, a distinction is made between the care recipients who are and the ones who are not a family member of the informal caregiver. The results indicate that an extra hour of informal care is worth about 9 or 10 Euros. This equals 8 or 9 Euros if the care recipient is a family member and about 7 or 9 Euros if not. When applying the contingent valuation method to the same sample, the value obtained was 10.52 Euros per hour. This paper concludes that the well-being valuation method is a useful complement to the more traditional valuation methods in the health economics literature in general and more particularly for the economic valuation of informal care: it includes all costs and effects associated with providing care from the perspective of the informal caregiver, it is relatively cheap to implement, and it offers an additional possibility to determine the convergent validity of the different monetary valuation methods. (c) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17380470     DOI: 10.1002/hec.1224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Econ        ISSN: 1057-9230            Impact factor:   3.046


  21 in total

1.  Costs and benefits of home care for the elderly versus residential care: a comparison using propensity scores.

Authors:  Lucy Kok; Caroline Berden; Klarita Sadiraj
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2014-01-04

2.  How to include informal care in economic evaluations.

Authors:  Renske J Hoefman; Job van Exel; Werner Brouwer
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Validation of the Care-Related Quality of Life Instrument in different study settings: findings from The Older Persons and Informal Caregivers Survey Minimum DataSet (TOPICS-MDS).

Authors:  J E Lutomski; N J A van Exel; G I J M Kempen; E P Moll van Charante; W P J den Elzen; A P D Jansen; P F M Krabbe; B Steunenberg; E W Steyerberg; M G M Olde Rikkert; R J F Melis
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  The Subjective Well-Being Method of Valuation: An Application to General Health Status.

Authors:  Timothy T Brown
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Costs of informal care in a sample of German geriatric stroke survivors.

Authors:  Diana Albrecht; Tanja Wollensak; Christian Ernst; Clemens Becker; Martin Hautzinger; Klaus Pfeiffer
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2015-10-28

6.  Economic Evaluation of Mental Health Interventions: A Guide to Costing Approaches.

Authors:  James Shearer; Paul McCrone; Renee Romeo
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 7.  The Valuation of Informal Care in Cost-of-Illness Studies: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Juan Oliva-Moreno; Marta Trapero-Bertran; Luz Maria Peña-Longobardo; Raúl Del Pozo-Rubio
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  An overview of methods and applications to value informal care in economic evaluations of healthcare.

Authors:  Marc A Koopmanschap; Job N A van Exel; Bernard van den Berg; Werner B F Brouwer
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 9.  Comparison of informal care time and costs in different age-related dementias: a review.

Authors:  Nadège Costa; Laura Ferlicoq; Hélène Derumeaux-Burel; Thomas Rapp; Valérie Garnault; Sophie Gillette-Guyonnet; Sandrine Andrieu; Bruno Vellas; Michel Lamure; Alain Grand; Laurent Molinier
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Perspective on the economic evaluation of deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Emma Sarah McIntosh
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.