Literature DB >> 17379579

Maintenance of fork integrity at damaged DNA and natural pause sites.

Hélène Tourrière1, Philippe Pasero.   

Abstract

S phase is a period of great vulnerability for the genome of eukaryotic cells. Many complicated processes are undertaken during this critical phase of the cell cycle, including the complete unwinding and the duplication of enormously complex DNA molecules. During this process, replication forks frequently encounter obstacles that impede their progression. Arrested forks are unstable structures that have to be stabilized and restarted in order to prevent the formation of double-strand breaks and/or unscheduled homologous recombination. To this aim, cells have evolved complex surveillance mechanisms sensing DNA damage and replication stress. The past decade has seen a dramatic advance in our understanding of how these regulatory pathways act in response to exogenous replication stress. However, the mechanism by which fork integrity is maintained at natural replication-impeding sequences remains obscure. Here, we discuss recent findings about how checkpoint-dependent and -independent mechanisms cooperate to prevent genomic instability at stalled forks, both in normal S phase and in the presence of exogenous genotoxic stress.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17379579     DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2007.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  90 in total

1.  Transcription termination maintains chromosome integrity.

Authors:  Robert S Washburn; Max E Gottesman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  RAD53 is limiting in double-strand break repair and in protection against toxicity associated with ribonucleotide reductase inhibition.

Authors:  Shay Covo; James W Westmoreland; Amit K Reddy; Dmitry A Gordenin; Michael A Resnick
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2012-01-23

3.  Analysis of replication profiles reveals key role of RFC-Ctf18 in yeast replication stress response.

Authors:  Laure Crabbé; Aubin Thomas; Véronique Pantesco; John De Vos; Philippe Pasero; Armelle Lengronne
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2010-10-24       Impact factor: 15.369

4.  Regulation of rtt107 recruitment to stalled DNA replication forks by the cullin rtt101 and the rtt109 acetyltransferase.

Authors:  Tania M Roberts; Iram Waris Zaidi; Jessica A Vaisica; Matthias Peter; Grant W Brown
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 5.  RecQ helicases: guardian angels of the DNA replication fork.

Authors:  Csanád Z Bachrati; Ian D Hickson
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 4.316

6.  Ride the wavelet: A multiscale analysis of genomic contexts flanking small insertions and deletions.

Authors:  Erika M Kvikstad; Francesca Chiaromonte; Kateryna D Makova
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Differential regulation of homologous recombination at DNA breaks and replication forks by the Mrc1 branch of the S-phase checkpoint.

Authors:  Constance Alabert; Julien N Bianco; Philippe Pasero
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  Homologous recombination rescues ssDNA gaps generated by nucleotide excision repair and reduced translesion DNA synthesis in yeast G2 cells.

Authors:  Wenjian Ma; James W Westmoreland; Michael A Resnick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Replicating damaged DNA in eukaryotes.

Authors:  Nimrat Chatterjee; Wolfram Siede
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 10.005

10.  UvrD and UvrD252 counteract RecQ, RecJ, and RecFOR in a rep mutant of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Roxane Lestini; Bénédicte Michel
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 3.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.