Literature DB >> 17379417

When words are painful: unraveling the mechanisms of the nocebo effect.

F Benedetti1, M Lanotte, L Lopiano, L Colloca.   

Abstract

The nocebo effect is a phenomenon that is opposite to the placebo effect, whereby expectation of a negative outcome may lead to the worsening of a symptom. Thus far, its study has been limited by ethical constraints, particularly in patients, as a nocebo procedure is per se stressful and anxiogenic. It basically consists in delivering verbal suggestions of negative outcomes so that the subject expects clinical worsening. Although some natural nocebo situations do exist, such as the impact of negative diagnoses upon the patient and the patient's distrust in a therapy, the neurobiological mechanisms have been understood in the experimental setting under strictly controlled conditions. As for the placebo counterpart, the study of pain has been fruitful in recent years to understand both the neuroanatomical and the neurochemical bases of the nocebo effect. Recent experimental evidence indicates that negative verbal suggestions induce anticipatory anxiety about the impending pain increase, and this verbally-induced anxiety triggers the activation of cholecystokinin (CCK) which, in turn, facilitates pain transmission. CCK-antagonists have been found to block this anxiety-induced hyperalgesia, thus opening up the possibility of new therapeutic strategies whenever pain has an important anxiety component. Other conditions, such as Parkinson's disease, although less studied, have been found to be affected by nocebo suggestions as well. All these findings underscore the important role of cognition in the therapeutic outcome, and suggest that nocebo and nocebo-related effects might represent a point of vulnerability both in the course of a disease and in the response to a therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17379417     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.02.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  107 in total

Review 1.  Nocebo in headaches: implications for clinical practice and trial design.

Authors:  Dimos D Mitsikostas
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.081

2.  Preventing motor training through nocebo suggestions.

Authors:  Antonella Pollo; Elisa Carlino; Lene Vase; Fabrizio Benedetti
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 3.  The placebo effect: From concepts to genes.

Authors:  B Colagiuri; L A Schenk; M D Kessler; S G Dorsey; L Colloca
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 4.  Is our brain hardwired to produce God, or is our brain hardwired to perceive God? A systematic review on the role of the brain in mediating religious experience.

Authors:  Alexander A Fingelkurts; Andrew A Fingelkurts
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2009-05-27

Review 5.  Asklepian dreaming and the spirit of transformational healing: linking the placebo response to therapeutic uses of self.

Authors:  Mick Collins
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2013-03

Review 6.  Central modulation of pain.

Authors:  Michael H Ossipov; Gregory O Dussor; Frank Porreca
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 7.  Understanding placebo and nocebo responses for pain management.

Authors:  Luana Colloca; Christian Grillon
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2014-06

Review 8.  Placebo: misunderstandings and prejudices.

Authors:  Matthias Breidert; Karl Hofbauer
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 9.  The Role of Patient-Practitioner Relationships in Placebo and Nocebo Phenomena.

Authors:  Maxie Blasini; Nathalie Peiris; Thelma Wright; Luana Colloca
Journal:  Int Rev Neurobiol       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 3.230

Review 10.  Optimizing Placebo and Minimizing Nocebo to Reduce Pain, Catastrophizing, and Opioid Use: A Review of the Science and an Evidence-Informed Clinical Toolkit.

Authors:  Beth D Darnall; Luana Colloca
Journal:  Int Rev Neurobiol       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 3.230

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.