Literature DB >> 17379090

Tissue-sparing effect of x-ray microplanar beams particularly in the CNS: is a bystander effect involved?

F Avraham Dilmanian1, Yun Qu, Ludwig E Feinendegen, Louis A Peña, Tigran Bacarian, Fritz A Henn, John Kalef-Ezra, Su Liu, Zhong Zhong, John W McDonald.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Normal tissues, including the central nervous system, tolerate single exposures to narrow planes of synchrotron-generated x-rays (microplanar beams; microbeams) up to several hundred Gy. The repairs apparently involve the microvasculature and the glial system. We evaluate a hypothesis on the involvement of bystander effects in these repairs.
METHODS: Confluent cultures of bovine aortic endothelial cells were irradiated with three parallel 27-microm microbeams at 24 Gy. Rats' spinal cords were transaxially irradiated with a single microplanar beam, 270 microm thick, at 750 Gy; the dose distribution in tissue was calculated.
RESULTS: Within 6 hours following irradiation of the cell culture the hit cells died, apparently by apoptosis, were lost, and the confluency was maintained. The spinal cord study revealed a loss of oligodendrocytes, astrocytes, and myelin in 2 weeks, but by 3 months repopulation and remyelination was nearly complete. Monte Carlo simulations showed that the microbeam dose fell from the peak's 80% to 20% in 9 microm.
CONCLUSIONS: In both studies the repair processes could have involved "beneficial" bystander effects leading to tissue restoration, most likely through the release of growth factors, such as cytokines, and the initiation of cell-signaling cascades. In cell culture these events could have promoted fast disappearance of the hit cells and fast structural response of the surviving neighboring cells, while in the spinal cord study similar events could have been promoting angiogenesis to replace damaged capillary blood vessels, and proliferation, migration, and differentiation of the progenitor glial cells to produce new, mature, and functional glial cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17379090     DOI: 10.1016/j.exphem.2007.01.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Hematol        ISSN: 0301-472X            Impact factor:   3.084


  28 in total

Review 1.  Radiation-induced bystander signalling in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Kevin M Prise; Joe M O'Sullivan
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  Double-strand breaks on F98 glioma rat cells induced by minibeam and broad-beam synchrotron radiation therapy.

Authors:  S Gil; Y Prezado; M Sabés
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-11-23       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Minibeam therapy with protons and light ions: physical feasibility and potential to reduce radiation side effects and to facilitate hypofractionation.

Authors:  F Avraham Dilmanian; John G Eley; Sunil Krishnan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Non-conventional Ultra-High Dose Rate (FLASH) Microbeam Radiotherapy Provides Superior Normal Tissue Sparing in Rat Lung Compared to Non-conventional Ultra-High Dose Rate (FLASH) Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Michael D Wright; Pantaleo Romanelli; Alberto Bravin; Geraldine Le Duc; Elke Brauer-Krisch; Herwig Requardt; Stefan Bartzsch; Ruslan Hlushchuk; Jean-Albert Laissue; Valentin Djonov
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-11-06

5.  Image-guided microbeam irradiation to brain tumour bearing mice using a carbon nanotube x-ray source array.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; Hong Yuan; Laurel M Burk; Christy R Inscoe; Michael J Hadsell; Pavel Chtcheprov; Yueh Z Lee; Jianping Lu; Sha Chang; Otto Zhou
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  High-precision radiosurgical dose delivery by interlaced microbeam arrays of high-flux low-energy synchrotron X-rays.

Authors:  Raphaël Serduc; Elke Bräuer-Krisch; Erik A Siegbahn; Audrey Bouchet; Benoit Pouyatos; Romain Carron; Nicolas Pannetier; Luc Renaud; Gilles Berruyer; Christian Nemoz; Thierry Brochard; Chantal Rémy; Emmanuel L Barbier; Alberto Bravin; Géraldine Le Duc; Antoine Depaulis; François Estève; Jean A Laissue
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Treating Brain Tumor with Microbeam Radiation Generated by a Compact Carbon-Nanotube-Based Irradiator: Initial Radiation Efficacy Study.

Authors:  Hong Yuan; Lei Zhang; Jonathan E Frank; Christina R Inscoe; Laurel M Burk; Mike Hadsell; Yueh Z Lee; Jianping Lu; Sha Chang; Otto Zhou
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 2.841

8.  A proof of principle experiment for microbeam radiation therapy at the Munich compact light source.

Authors:  Annique C Dombrowsky; Karin Burger; Ann-Kristin Porth; Marlon Stein; Martin Dierolf; Benedikt Günther; Klaus Achterhold; Bernhard Gleich; Annette Feuchtinger; Stefan Bartzsch; Elke Beyreuther; Stephanie E Combs; Franz Pfeiffer; Jan J Wilkens; Thomas E Schmid
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2019-10-26       Impact factor: 1.925

9.  Evaluating the peak-to-valley dose ratio of synchrotron microbeams using PRESAGE fluorescence.

Authors:  N Annabell; N Yagi; K Umetani; C Wong; M Geso
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 2.616

10.  Synchrotron-generated microbeam sensorimotor cortex transections induce seizure control without disruption of neurological functions.

Authors:  Pantaleo Romanelli; Erminia Fardone; Giuseppe Battaglia; Elke Bräuer-Krisch; Yolanda Prezado; Herwig Requardt; Geraldine Le Duc; Christian Nemoz; David J Anschel; Jenny Spiga; Alberto Bravin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.