Literature DB >> 17378866

The Learning Practice Inventory: diagnosing and developing Learning Practices in the UK.

Rosemary K Rushmer1, Diane Kelly, Murray Lough, Joyce E Wilkinson, Gail J Greig, Huw T O Davies.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
SETTING: This paper outlines the development of a diagnostic tool to help Primary Care general practitioner (GP) Practices diagnose the extent to which they are developing effective techniques for collective learning and if their Practice culture supports innovation. This project is undertaken by the University of St Andrews and NHS Education for Scotland.
METHODS: Based on Learning Organization and Organizational Learning theory, and using a modified Behaviourally Anchored Rating Scale, the Learning Practice Inventory (LPI) identifies attitudes, behaviours, processes, systems and organizational arrangements associated with being a Learning Practice. The LPI is a self-assessment, fixed-choice, survey-feedback tool that surveys all Practice members.
RESULTS: The survey-feedback tool empowers Practice members to view, assess and prioritize the developments they wish to make collectively to Practice life. The LPI assumes complexity and non-linearity in change processes, used longitudinally it tracks the impact of change on Practice life through time. Practitioners and Practices involved in its development give favourable feedback on the tool, and its potential usefulness. DISCUSSION: This contributes to our wider understanding in three main ways: first, it applies the ideas of Learning Organizations and Organizational Learning to health care settings. Second, as a practical advance, the tool assumes complexity, non-linearity and systemic knock-on effects during change in Primary Care. Third, it offers practitioners who work together the opportunity to share knowledge and learning in practical ways helping them to change by themselves and for themselves and their patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17378866     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00673.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract        ISSN: 1356-1294            Impact factor:   2.431


  2 in total

1.  Supported local implementation of clinical guidelines in psychiatry: a two-year follow-up.

Authors:  Tord Forsner; Anna Aberg Wistedt; Mats Brommels; Imre Janszky; Antonio Ponce de Leon; Yvonne Forsell
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 2.  Measuring organizational and individual factors thought to influence the success of quality improvement in primary care: a systematic review of instruments.

Authors:  Sue E Brennan; Marije Bosch; Heather Buchan; Sally E Green
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 7.327

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.