Literature DB >> 17378424

The subjective duration of ramped and damped sounds.

Massimo Grassi1, Christopher J Darwin.   

Abstract

Two experiments demonstrate that the perceived durations of sounds as long as 1 sec are influenced by the sounds' amplitude envelopes, extending Schlauch, Ries, and DiGiovanni's (2001) observations on sounds of 200-msec duration. Sounds with a monotonic decay (i.e., damped sounds) are heard as substantially shorter than both steady sounds and those with a monotonic increase of level (i.e., ramped sounds). Neither a reaction time (Experiments 1 and 2) nor a staircase (Experiment 2) procedure supported a sensory explanation for these different subjective durations. The results are compatible with the suggestion of Stecker and Hafter (2000) that listeners exclude part of the tails of damped sounds in the computation of their subjective durations.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17378424     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193737

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  10 in total

1.  Examining auditory kappa effects through manipulating intensity differences between sequential tones.

Authors:  Doug Alards-Tomalin; Launa C Leboe-McGowan; Todd A Mondor
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-04-27

2.  The role of temporal-masking patterns in the determination of subjective duration and loudness for ramped and damped sounds.

Authors:  Dennis T Ries; Robert S Schlauch; Jeffrey J DiGiovanni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Statistics of natural reverberation enable perceptual separation of sound and space.

Authors:  James Traer; Josh H McDermott
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Evidence for a basic level in a taxonomy of everyday action sounds.

Authors:  Guillaume Lemaitre; Laurie M Heller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Audition dominates vision in duration perception irrespective of salience, attention, and temporal discriminability.

Authors:  Laura Ortega; Emmanuel Guzman-Martinez; Marcia Grabowecky; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Slow Resting State Fluctuations Enhance Neuronal and Behavioral Responses to Looming Sounds.

Authors:  B Sancristóbal; F Ferri; A Longtin; M G Perrucci; G L Romani; G Northoff
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 3.020

7.  The time course of auditory looming cues in redirecting visuo-spatial attention.

Authors:  Christiane Glatz; Lewis L Chuang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Perceptual distortions in pitch and time reveal active prediction and support for an auditory pitch-motion hypothesis.

Authors:  Molly J Henry; J Devin McAuley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Perceptual Temporal Asymmetry Associated with Distinct ON and OFF Responses to Time-Varying Sounds with Rising versus Falling Intensity: A Magnetoencephalography Study.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Bing Cheng; Tess K Koerner; Robert S Schlauch; Keita Tanaka; Masaki Kawakatsu; Iku Nemoto; Toshiaki Imada
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2016-08-05

10.  On the generalization of tones: A detailed exploration of non-speech auditory perception stimuli.

Authors:  Michael Schutz; Jessica Gillard
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.