Literature DB >> 17378177

Measurement and evaluation of the acoustic noise of a 3 Tesla MR scanner.

Yoko Hattori1, Hiroshi Fukatsu, Takeo Ishigaki.   

Abstract

We measured the sound level and frequencies of the acoustic noise generated by a 3 Tesla (T) MR scanner, and investigated the subjective sound level for 30 healthy volunteers with either earplugs, headphones or both. The sound level of 3T was found to be higher than that of 1.5T in all sequences. The peak sound pressure level of 3T ranged from 125.7 dB for MR angiography to 130.7 dB for single shot EPI on the linear scale. The equivalent noise level was from 110.0 dB for FLAIR to 115.8 dB for T1-IR on the A-weighted scale, which exceeded 99 dB, the level regulated by the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). The study of the subjective sound level showed that the effect of noise reduction was not significantly different between earplugs and headphones. However, the use of both devices could reduce the subjective sound level significantly better than either one alone (P < 0.01). Thus we propose wearing both devices for ear-protection during 3T examinations.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17378177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nagoya J Med Sci        ISSN: 0027-7622            Impact factor:   1.131


  17 in total

1.  Acoustic noise reduction in T 1- and proton-density-weighted turbo spin-echo imaging.

Authors:  Martin Ott; Martin Blaimer; Felix Breuer; David Grodzki; Björn Heismann; Peter Jakob
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Quiet MR sequences in clinical routine: initial experience in abdominal imaging.

Authors:  Sebastian Fischer; David M Grodzki; Markus Domschke; Moritz Albrecht; Boris Bodelle; Katrin Eichler; Renate Hammerstingl; Thomas J Vogl; Stephan Zangos
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Measuring human placental blood flow with multidelay 3D GRASE pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling at 3T.

Authors:  Xingfeng Shao; Dapeng Liu; Thomas Martin; Teresa Chanlaw; Sherin U Devaskar; Carla Janzen; Aisling M Murphy; Daniel Margolis; Kyunghyun Sung; Danny J J Wang
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Qualitative and quantitative analysis of 3D T1 Silent imaging.

Authors:  Francesca Di Giuliano; Silvia Minosse; Eliseo Picchi; Valentina Ferrazzoli; Valerio Da Ros; Massimo Muto; Chiara Adriana Pistolese; Francesco Garaci; Roberto Floris
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 5.  Pediatric neuroimaging in early childhood and infancy: challenges and practical guidelines.

Authors:  Nora Raschle; Jennifer Zuk; Silvia Ortiz-Mantilla; Danielle D Sliva; Angela Franceschi; P Ellen Grant; April A Benasich; Nadine Gaab
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Comparison of image quality characteristics on Silent MR versus conventional MR imaging of brain lesions at 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Susanne Ohlmann-Knafo; Melanie Morlo; David Laszlo Tarnoki; Adam Domonkos Tarnoki; Barbara Grabowski; Melanie Kaspar; Dirk Pickuth
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Effect of headphones on sevoflurane requirement for MRI.

Authors:  Mustafa Oğurlu; Mehmet Emin Orhan; Salih Çinar; Ertan Piri; Ercan Kurt; Necdet Sut; Alparslan Turan
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-08-12

Review 8.  3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging noise in standard head and neck sequence does not cause temporary threshold shift in high frequency.

Authors:  Elizabeth Yenn Lynn Lim; Ing Ping Tang; Mohammadreza Peyman; Norlisah Ramli; Prepageran Narayanan; Raman Rajagopalan
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Sensorineural hearing loss after magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Abolfazl Mollasadeghi; Amir Houshang Mehrparvar; Saeid Atighechi; Mohammad Hossein Davari; Pedram Shokouh; Mehrdad Mostaghaci; Maryam Bahaloo
Journal:  Case Rep Radiol       Date:  2013-06-17

10.  Effect of scanner acoustic background noise on strict resting-state fMRI.

Authors:  C Rondinoni; E Amaro; F Cendes; A C dos Santos; C E G Salmon
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 2.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.