PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of core antigen (Ortho trak-C assay) as a marker of active HCV infection in comparison to HCV RNA as detected by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). METHODS: This evaluation was carried out during January 2000 to December 2003 in HCV infected individuals who were treatment naomicronve or were on anti-viral therapy. Additionally, sequential plasma samples from patients on clinical follow-up were included in this study. A total of 167 samples from 61 patients were tested by trak-C and RT-PCR. HCV RNA detection was achieved by a RT-PCR. Trak-C assay results were also compared in a limited proportion of these samples with known HCV viral load and genotype. RESULTS: Of 167 samples tested, 56.9% were RNA positive and 43.1% were RNA negative while 50.3% were trak-C positive and 49.7% were trak-C negative, yielding a sensitivity of 85.3% and a specificity of 95.8% for the trak-C assay (Kappa co-efficient = 0.8). The concentration of HCVcAg and HCV RNA showed significant correlation (n=38, r=0.334, P =0.04). The trak-C assay detected the most prevalent HCV genotypes in India without significant difference (P =0.335). The difference between mean absorbance values of HCV RNA positive samples compared to HCV RNA negative samples in the trak-C assay was highly significant (P < 0.000). Qualitative results of trak-C assay and RT-PCR were comparable in 93% of follow-up samples. CONCLUSIONS: Trak-C assay can be recommended for confirmation of HCV infection and follow-up in laboratories with resource-poor facilities.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of core antigen (Ortho trak-C assay) as a marker of active HCV infection in comparison to HCV RNA as detected by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). METHODS: This evaluation was carried out during January 2000 to December 2003 in HCV infected individuals who were treatment naomicronve or were on anti-viral therapy. Additionally, sequential plasma samples from patients on clinical follow-up were included in this study. A total of 167 samples from 61 patients were tested by trak-C and RT-PCR. HCV RNA detection was achieved by a RT-PCR. Trak-C assay results were also compared in a limited proportion of these samples with known HCV viral load and genotype. RESULTS: Of 167 samples tested, 56.9% were RNA positive and 43.1% were RNA negative while 50.3% were trak-C positive and 49.7% were trak-C negative, yielding a sensitivity of 85.3% and a specificity of 95.8% for the trak-C assay (Kappa co-efficient = 0.8). The concentration of HCVcAg and HCV RNA showed significant correlation (n=38, r=0.334, P =0.04). The trak-C assay detected the most prevalent HCV genotypes in India without significant difference (P =0.335). The difference between mean absorbance values of HCV RNA positive samples compared to HCV RNA negative samples in the trak-C assay was highly significant (P < 0.000). Qualitative results of trak-C assay and RT-PCR were comparable in 93% of follow-up samples. CONCLUSIONS: Trak-C assay can be recommended for confirmation of HCV infection and follow-up in laboratories with resource-poor facilities.
Authors: Pankaj Puri; Anil C Anand; Vivek A Saraswat; Subrat K Acharya; Shiv K Sarin; Radha K Dhiman; Rakesh Aggarwal; Shivaram P Singh; Deepak Amarapurkar; Anil Arora; Mohinish Chhabra; Kamal Chetri; Gourdas Choudhuri; Vinod K Dixit; Ajay Duseja; Ajay K Jain; Dharmesh Kapoor; Premashis Kar; Abraham Koshy; Ashish Kumar; Kaushal Madan; Sri P Misra; Mohan V G Prasad; Aabha Nagral; Amarendra S Puri; R Jeyamani; Sanjiv Saigal; Samir Shah; Praveen K Sharma; Ajit Sood; Sandeep Thareja; Manav Wadhawan Journal: J Clin Exp Hepatol Date: 2014-06-24