Literature DB >> 1737710

A randomized trial of the cost effectiveness of VA hospital-based home care for the terminally ill.

S L Hughes1, J Cummings, F Weaver, L Manheim, B Braun, K Conrad.   

Abstract

All admissions to a 1,100-bed Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) hospital were screened to identify 171 terminally ill patients with informal caregivers who were then randomly assigned to VA hospital-based team home care (HBHC, N = 85) or customary care (N = 86). Patient functioning, and patient and caregiver morale and satisfaction with care were measured at baseline, one month, and six months. Health services utilization was monitored over the six-month study period and converted to cost. Findings included no differences in patient survival, activities of daily living (ADL), cognitive functioning, or morale, but a significant increase in patient (p = .02) and caregiver (p = .005) satisfaction with care at one month. A substitution effect of HBHC was seen. Those in the experimental group used 5.9 fewer VA hospital days (p = .03), resulting in a $1,639 or 47 percent per capita saving in VA hospital costs (p = .02). As a result, total per capita health care costs, including HBHC, were $769 or 18 percent (n.s.) lower in the HBHC sample, indicating that expansion of VA HBHC to serve terminally ill veterans would increase satisfaction with care at no additional cost.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1737710      PMCID: PMC1069857     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  15 in total

Review 1.  The measurement and meaning of patient satisfaction.

Authors:  J E Ware; A Davies-Avery; A L Stewart
Journal:  Health Med Care Serv Rev       Date:  1978 Jan-Feb

2.  Cost-effectiveness of Veterans Administration hospital-based home care. A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  J E Cummings; S L Hughes; F M Weaver; L M Manheim; K J Conrad; K Nash; B Braun; J Adelman
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1990-06

3.  Effects of an expanding home care program for the terminally ill.

Authors:  J McCusker; A M Stoddard
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  The use of functional assessment in understanding home care needs.

Authors:  R H Fortinsky; C V Granger; G B Seltzer
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  A research and service oriented multilevel assessment instrument.

Authors:  M P Lawton; M Moss; M Fulcomer; M H Kleban
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1982-01

6.  Standards for hospice care: assumptions and principles.

Authors:  Z Foster
Journal:  Health Soc Work       Date:  1979-02

7.  A randomized trial of Veterans Administration home care for severely disabled veterans.

Authors:  S L Hughes; J Cummings; F Weaver; L M Manheim; K J Conrad; K Nash
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  A randomised controlled trial of hospice care.

Authors:  R L Kane; J Wales; L Bernstein; A Leibowitz; S Kaplan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-04-21       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  A randomized controlled study of a home health care team.

Authors:  J G Zimmer; A Groth-Juncker; J McCusker
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  A new approach to hospital cost functions and some issues in revenue regulation.

Authors:  B Friedman; M V Pauly
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1983-03
View more
  41 in total

Review 1.  Living with and dying from heart failure: the role of palliative care.

Authors:  J S R Gibbs; A S M McCoy; L M E Gibbs; A E Rogers; J M Addington-Hall
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Socioeconomic disparities in the use of home health services in a medicare managed care population.

Authors:  Vicki A Freedman; Jeannette Rogowski; Steven L Wickstrom; John Adams; Jonas Marainen; José J Escarce
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Predictors of home care expenditures and death at home for cancer patients in an integrated comprehensive palliative home care pilot program.

Authors:  Doris M Howell; Tom Abernathy; Rhonda Cockerill; Kevin Brazil; Frank Wagner; Larry Librach
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2011-02

4.  Factors Associated with End-of-Life Health Service Use in Patients Dying of Cancer.

Authors:  Lisa Barbera; Jonathan Sussman; Raymond Viola; Amna Husain; Doris Howell; S Lawrence Librach; Hugh Walker; Rinku Sutradhar; Carole Chartier; Lawrence Paszat
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2010-02

5.  Acceptability of early discharge, hospital at home schemes. Treatments that can be safely and acceptably managed at home need to be defined.

Authors:  M Montalto; M L Grayson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-12-12

6.  Oncology and palliative care: bringing together the two solitudes.

Authors:  M R McKenzie
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-06-30       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Enhancing family physician capacity to deliver quality palliative home care: an end-of-life, shared-care model.

Authors:  Denise Marshall; Doris Howell; Kevin Brazil; Michelle Howard; Alan Taniguchi
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  Randomised controlled trial comparing hospital at home care with inpatient hospital care. I: three month follow up of health outcomes.

Authors:  S Shepperd; D Harwood; C Jenkinson; A Gray; M Vessey; P Morgan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-06-13

Review 9.  Palliative care reduces morbidity and mortality in cancer.

Authors:  Gabrielle B Rocque; James F Cleary
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 66.675

10.  Randomised controlled trial comparing hospital at home care with inpatient hospital care. II: cost minimisation analysis.

Authors:  S Shepperd; D Harwood; A Gray; M Vessey; P Morgan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-06-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.