Literature DB >> 17377055

The National Oncologic PET Registry: expanded medicare coverage for PET under coverage with evidence development.

Matthew J Lindsay1, Barry A Siegel, Sean R Tunis, Bruce E Hillner, Anthony F Shields, Brian P Carey, R Edward Coleman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to review the recent expansion of Medicare coverage for 18F-FDG PET for certain cancer indications under the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' new Coverage with Evidence Development (CED) policy and to describe the specific operational mechanics of the National Oncologic PET Registry (NOPR).
CONCLUSION: The NOPR will make possible a more accurate assessment of the actual influence of PET on patient management across a wide spectrum of cancer indications. By linking access to PET for virtually all Medicare beneficiaries to the collection of clinically valuable evidence, the NOPR represents the cutting edge of the CED approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17377055     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.06.1175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  11 in total

Review 1.  Ethical issues in using data from quality management programs.

Authors:  David R Nerenz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Proceedings: Pathways for Successful Translation of New Imaging Agents and Modalities-Phase III Studies.

Authors:  Sanjiv S Gambhir; Lalitha K Shankar; Eben Rosenthal; Jason M Warram; Munir Ghesani; Thomas A Hope; Paula M Jacobs; Gunilla B Jacobson; Terri Wilson; Barry A Siegel
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Hospice Admission and Survival After 18F-Fluoride PET Performed for Evaluation of Osseous Metastatic Disease in the National Oncologic PET Registry.

Authors:  Ilana F Gareen; Bruce E Hillner; Lucy Hanna; Rajesh Makineni; Fenghai Duan; Anthony F Shields; Rathan M Subramaniam; Barry A Siegel
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 4.  Funding the unfundable: mechanisms for managing uncertainty in decisions on the introduction of new and innovative technologies into healthcare systems.

Authors:  Tania Stafinski; Christopher J McCabe; Devidas Menon
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Intended versus inferred management after PET for cancer restaging: analysis of Medicare claims linked to a coverage with evidence development registry.

Authors:  Bruce E Hillner; Tor D Tosteson; Anna N A Tosteson; Qianfei Wang; Yunjie Song; Tracy Onega; Lucy G Hanna; Barry A Siegel
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Geographic and sociodemographic disparities in PET use by Medicare beneficiaries with cancer.

Authors:  Tracy Onega; Tor D Tosteson; Qianfei Wang; Bruce E Hillner; Yunjie Song; Barry A Siegel; Anna N A Tosteson
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.532

7.  How Does the Patient Benefit from Clinical PET?

Authors:  Jens Sörensen
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 11.556

Review 8.  PET probes beyond (18)F-FDG.

Authors:  Lei Jiang; Yingfeng Tu; Hongcheng Shi; Zhen Cheng
Journal:  J Biomed Res       Date:  2014-04-15

Review 9.  Prospective of 68Ga Radionuclide Contribution to the Development of Imaging Agents for Infection and Inflammation.

Authors:  Irina Velikyan
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 10.  Medical imaging and nuclear medicine: a Lancet Oncology Commission.

Authors:  Hedvig Hricak; May Abdel-Wahab; Rifat Atun; Miriam Mikhail Lette; Diana Paez; James A Brink; Lluís Donoso-Bach; Guy Frija; Monika Hierath; Ola Holmberg; Pek-Lan Khong; Jason S Lewis; Geraldine McGinty; Wim J G Oyen; Lawrence N Shulman; Zachary J Ward; Andrew M Scott
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 41.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.