OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to investigate the contrast dynamics and the relationship between visualization of intraarticular structures and time elapsed between intraarticular injection of contrast agent and MRI in symptomatic patients referred for MR arthrography of the shoulder, hip, and wrist. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Our local ethics committees and the national drug administration approved this multicentric study. We prospectively studied 11 shoulders, 11 hips, and 10 wrists. After the intraarticular gadolinium injection, patients underwent a baseline MR arthrography protocol (time point [TP] 1) and subsequent MRI at another four time points (TP 2-TP 5) up to 240 minutes. The course of contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) over time was calculated. Three observers assessed the degree of visualization of different intraarticular structures and the overall image quality at each time point using a 3-point scale and a 5-point scale, respectively. RESULTS: For all joints, CNR measurements showed peak CNR at TP 1 (21 minutes) and TP 2 (45 minutes) with a subsequent, near-logarithmic decline of CNR values over time. Visualization of different anatomic structures decreased over time. Overall image quality was insufficient for diagnostic purposes at TP 3 (96 minutes) in three (27%) of 11 shoulders and in three (27%) of 11 hips. In two (20%) of 10 wrists, image quality was insufficient at TP 2 (45 minutes). CONCLUSION: For MR arthrography, the degree of visualization of intraarticular structures depends on the time elapsed between contrast injection and MRI. MR arthrography of the shoulder and hip should be performed within 90 minutes, and MR arthrography of the wrist should be performed within 45 minutes, after intraarticular injection.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to investigate the contrast dynamics and the relationship between visualization of intraarticular structures and time elapsed between intraarticular injection of contrast agent and MRI in symptomatic patients referred for MR arthrography of the shoulder, hip, and wrist. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Our local ethics committees and the national drug administration approved this multicentric study. We prospectively studied 11 shoulders, 11 hips, and 10 wrists. After the intraarticular gadolinium injection, patients underwent a baseline MR arthrography protocol (time point [TP] 1) and subsequent MRI at another four time points (TP 2-TP 5) up to 240 minutes. The course of contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) over time was calculated. Three observers assessed the degree of visualization of different intraarticular structures and the overall image quality at each time point using a 3-point scale and a 5-point scale, respectively. RESULTS: For all joints, CNR measurements showed peak CNR at TP 1 (21 minutes) and TP 2 (45 minutes) with a subsequent, near-logarithmic decline of CNR values over time. Visualization of different anatomic structures decreased over time. Overall image quality was insufficient for diagnostic purposes at TP 3 (96 minutes) in three (27%) of 11 shoulders and in three (27%) of 11 hips. In two (20%) of 10 wrists, image quality was insufficient at TP 2 (45 minutes). CONCLUSION: For MR arthrography, the degree of visualization of intraarticular structures depends on the time elapsed between contrast injection and MRI. MR arthrography of the shoulder and hip should be performed within 90 minutes, and MR arthrography of the wrist should be performed within 45 minutes, after intraarticular injection.
Authors: Carmelo Messina; Giuseppe Banfi; Alberto Aliprandi; Giovanni Mauri; Francesco Secchi; Francesco Sardanelli; Luca Maria Sconfienza Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-08-08 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Patrick Omoumi; Alexandra Rubini; Jean-Emile Dubuc; Bruno C Vande Berg; Frédéric E Lecouvet Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-11-08 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Eric M Gale; Hsiao-Ying Wey; Ian Ramsay; Yi-Fen Yen; David E Sosnovik; Peter Caravan Journal: Radiology Date: 2017-11-08 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Junfeng Wang; Huan Wang; Ian A Ramsay; Derek J Erstad; Bryan C Fuchs; Kenneth K Tanabe; Peter Caravan; Eric M Gale Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2018-09-25 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Michael D Ringler; Nicholas G Rhodes; Jennifer R Ayers-Ringler; Daniel R Jakaitis; Robert J McDonald; David F Kallmes; Jennifer S McDonald Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2021-01-06 Impact factor: 2.199